Author Archives: iamjema

Yet another Non Answer

The Honourable Julie Babrusin

Minister of the Environment, Climate Change and Nature.

MP for Toronto-Danforth

12 March 2026

Ms. Dabusin

From Hansard 11th March 2026

Dave Epp (Chatham-Kent—Leamington, CPC):  

    Mr. Speaker, our farmers and fishermen are being punished with unreliable fertilizer supplies and a rising fuel tax to 17¢ that is driving up the cost of everything. Instead of supporting them, the Liberals have shuttered agricultural research stations and fuelled the G7’s worst food inflation. It is outrageous that while he plays economist, one in five Canadians over 50 is now trapped in poverty, choosing between eating and heating.

    When will the current Liberal Prime Minister accept responsibility for what he can control and scrap the Liberal taxes and policies that are making life unaffordable for Canadians?

[Expand]

Hon. Julie Dabrusin (Minister of the Environment, Climate Change and Nature, Lib.):  

    Mr. Speaker, let me say it once again. Studies show that the impact of the industrial carbon price on the price of food is zero

Well Ms. Dabrusin, this is not the first time you have said this (as you did again today) along with a gesture that is almost a single finger salute, and I have to ask this:

If indeed as you say this tax has zero impact on food, just where does the impact lie?   It must lie somewhere as even this liberal government pretends that the taxes they charge go somewhere, and it would be interesting to know where you think this particular one goes so that it has zero affect upon food prices.   Maybe a green slush fund?

Over the last decade we have become accustomed to non answers by cabinet ministers, or their underlings, but this bunch of ministers in this “so called new government” under the ex-international banker has really hit the bottom of the pile in believability and honesty.

Lies, inuendo or outright contempt (MacKinnon) for opposition questioners and Canadians is now the norm and frankly I do not believe any Canadians appreciate that, and I think you can collectively do much, much better.

Canadian Parliamentary Hypocrisy

Starting with the “Take Note Debate” on 9th March 2026 entitled “Iran and the Middle East” so sparsely attended by Canadian representatives that one could be forgiven for thinking this was a totally unimportant “debate” and wonder why it was even held. However, the clear take away from this “debate”, which I watched in entirety, was the clear hate fest for Iran. The number of false statements made during this “debate” was astonishing and indicated an astounding ignorance and succumbing to the Zionist propaganda machine. It is on CPAC so don’t believe me watch for your selves.

There was virtually no mention made of the event that caused this debate in the first place, namely the totally unjustified attack upon Iran and the deliberate killing of that country’s supreme leader. This along with the attacks upon more civilian buildings including schools and hospitals is reminiscent of the Gaza genocide also conducted by the Zionist State and the USA (with some help from Canada).

For the second time in a year Israel and the USA have carried out a sneak attack in the middle of negotiations about something that could not happen anyway as the then Supreme Leader made it a religious statement that Iran would not have a nuke. The USA and Zionist are fake religious countries so they could not understand or accept that concept. This attack was not the act of either honesty or sanity and yet those in this “debate” chose to ignore that in their haste to pile hate on Iran. I have heard that the new Supreme leader is more hard line that his father and may very well withdraw that religious edict and start to make a nuke. Consequences eh?

Today, 11th March 2026 in Oral Questions the IRG was a main source of irritation and demands were made for the removal of numerous members of that organisation because Canada has declared them as a terrorist organisation, therefore they are a threat to the Zionists.

This is where the hypocrisy comes in to play.

The IDF is not listed as a terrorist group despite the genocide they have and are still committing in Gaza, and the support by Canadian parliamentarians of that genocide and the attacks, thefts and destruction being committed by the so called “settlers” in the West Bank. This is perhaps because all Canadian Parliamentarians appear to be under the control of the Zionist Lobby which tells them what to do, when and where they are to do it, hidden under the disguise of believing the Zionist State has the right to exist. I am beginning to believe they no longer should have that right.

No doubt I will be accused of be anti semantic but I am not; I have had and hopefully will continue to have some real Jews as good friends. They were/are friends who happened to be Jews and not Zionists for whom I have absolutely no time at all.

I really regret that this is not a one-off thing in Canadian Politics and anyone who follows the absurd antics in our Canadian House of Ill Repute who cannot see this is definitely in need of a rabbit hole through which they might visit and see the insanity of our elected representatives.

Alice had the nerve to go there – do you?

Ukraine

Sent to all Canadian MPs

As is my general practice I watched the Oral Question Period in the Canadian House of Commons on 24th February 2026, and was not expecting what happened immediately afterwards.

A motion full of falsehoods was presented to the House and unanimously adopted followed by speeches from members of all parties on the subject of the “war” in Donbas.   The wholesale illegal invasion of Ukraine has not yet happened.   Nor was it mentioned that a peace had already been proposed and accepted until a very stupid Englishman skuttled it on behalf of NATO.

None of this was even referred to. Why not?

It still rankles with me this morning after I have checked with Hansard that only one of the speakers even thought to mention what happened between 2014 and 2022 which either shows deliberate ignorance or willful blindness in order to serve false assertions.

According to all those who spoke this started 4 years ago in 2o22 and that is false.  Since the early part of the 21st century Canada has been heavily involved with the USA in causing turmoil in Ukraine resulting in the 2014 coup.  At that point Harper sent troops to train the Nazi battalions on how to attack civilians which they proceeded to do in the Donbas.

The civilians of the Donbas did not want to be part of the Nazi regime and stated their desire to be independent sovereign nations, much like our own Quebec. As a result, they were attacked by those Nazi battalions and this is where the bombing, shelling, shooting and raping of women and kidnapping of children for their organs happened.  This part was conveniently not mentioned yesterday because it does not fit the narrative of hatred to Russia and Putin claiming they did it. On the contrary the children taken to Russia were orphans who could not be left in the Donbas safely.

I would be grateful if any MP can correct me in my assessment of this and show me where it did not happen.

At least Alexis Brunelle Duceppe (BQ) mentioned “unrest” in the Donbas, and

Alexandre Boulerice (Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie, NPD):   24/Feb tribute to Ukraine   

 “Saving lives is paramount. Respecting the will of the Ukrainian people is the first priority. However, there is also the question of the kind of world we want to live in. Do we accept a world where brutality becomes the norm, where international law is flouted and where everything is based on power dynamics? Would we rather have a world built on dialogue, multilateralism, respect and decisions that are made on the basis of law and not brute force?”

Yes, this is true but the major offender in all of this over and over again is the USA and we simply let it happen as we have since WW2.

I have been ashamed of the parliament of Canada before but this time I have to point out that it appears that we have a bunch of well paid parrots sitting where humans should be. Humans who value and respect their employers and where as :

Elizabeth May (Saanich—Gulf Islands, GP):  

…..” It is extremely important and fundamental that Mr. Putin understand that Canada, every single last one of us, stands with Ukraine, which means Russia has made itself a pariah”….  

You are speaking for the members of parliament perhaps but you are not speaking for me as my MP.   I stand for the people of both Ukraine, the Donbas and Russia who just want to be left to live and love as they choose not as some far away self-important money grabbing people want them to die.

I am disgusted, do not condone your actions or words and certainly do not agree with your adoration for a Nazi or your hatred and fear of the Russian leader, though I reluctantly accept you have the right to go down that rabbit hole.

Jeremy Arney

Saanichton BC

Lumber for the far East

Corey Hogan MP for Calgary Confederation

Oral Questions 5th December 2025

From Hansard,

In response to a question about the Forestry sector’s chronic Liberal induced problems:

Corey Hogan (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Energy and Natural Resources, Lib.):  

    Mr. Speaker, obviously, the unjustified trade war that the United States has brought on softwood lumber is unacceptable. We are working hard to resolve it. Today, the United States Chamber of Commerce called on the Trump administration to drop tariffs on lumber. We are seeing that the pressures are beginning to build.

    We will continue to work at all levels to resolve this, and we will continue to provide supports. We welcome suggestions from members opposite on what supports to bring.

Well, since you asked for it, here is a suggestion for you which should really appeal to the banker.

There has been devastation in South East Asia from floods and slides resulting in homes by the thousands being demolished.

We have vast amounts of lumber which the USA ​apparently does not want, so we could send it all to those ​affected countries and allow their people to rebuild with good strong Canadian lumber.

Of course we cannot just donate that lumber because there is no money for it, but if we gave a huge contract to Brookfield to ship that lumber then we would be helping the banker to fill his pocket book, and it could come from the budget for the homes that will not be built in Canada for years yet because the administration organisations do not even have office space yet.

​

There is also the side effect that maybe we would be looked at with favour as a potential trade partner, instead of an arrogant bunch of political money grabbers.

That and of course saw mill workers, lumberjacks and truckers would still have a job.

If you can catch the banker in between his flights overseas for a rugby match or a photo op please submit it to him.

​ps: all the supports your government provides are at the further expense of taxpayers’ money and there is a limit to that.

Re: The generational Budget of 2025

5th November 2025

Re: The generational Budget of 2025

I do not have a telephone sized book (in either size or format) on this overdue budget and therefore have to base my comments on what was shouted out in the Canadian House of Ill Repute yesterday.

When a comment is repeated over and over again it is like a plea for the unbelievable to be believed. “We believe in Canada” was repeated 22 times in the course of this presentation and each time it grated on me a bit more as government members stood and clapped in vapid adoration of what is a complete falsehood. The Drama Queen and the Banker had/have only interest in making money for themselves and have no such belief in Canada or Canadians.

Again, and again the use of the wording “we will” or “we are going to” was used as it has for a decade now, specially though since the last election and is as fake as ever. Why are we still waiting for things to be done that could have been started years ago and maybe even completed by now?

Mention was made about doing things not done in such a scale since 1945 and I have to remind the two responsible for this boast that in 1945 we had the benefit of our own publicly owned Bank of Canada to finance what was done back then and for some 30 years thereafter. Since 1974 our bank has been virtually sidelined by the actions of the then governor Gerald Bouey who signed us into the grips of the Bank of International Settlements through Basel 1, 2 and 3 without consulting the actual owners of the Bank of Canada. Today our Bank of Canada is virtually emasculated into simply being an inflation watchdog thanks largely to our current PM.

How can a new deficit of $80 billion be acceptable to any monetarily aware person? The national debt clock show Canada’s debt at 1310 today 5th November 2025 a massive $2.75 trillion and rising fast.

A bit larger than that from 1945: $11.3 billion: This figure is cited as the net debt at the end of the war in 1945, according to the Fraser Institute, and this figure includes all the costs incurred in WW2. and proves that we have as a country mortgaged our future thanks to the current politicians.

Which brings me to this: Investments are speculations and when borrowed money is used to make those investments there should be some sort of plan to pay for that money. We are being led (if that is the right word) by a self-proclaimed investment banker who would not grant loans based on what was offered on Tuesday. No matter what you want to call them these investments are nothing more than expenses as there is absolutely no suggestion of financial returns which any normal person would expect from an investment.

I did not hear one word of how any of these expansive expenses would be paid for. Not one!!! There might have been one in the PDF version of the book and if so please advise me how I am expected to help pay for this largesse.

What really made me concerned is when I realised that my great grandchildren will not have the opportunity to live the lives I wanted to give them when I came to Canada in 1967. At my young age of 85 I still have to work part time to put food on my table and I fear that they will have to learn the art of dumpster diving to fed themselves.

As long as we have wealthy self-serving people pretending to work for Canada we will never get back to where we should be, and I find that very depressing and sad. I do not have a vote as such in the House but my MP is smart enough to object to this budget for reasons very different from mine but I will accept it.

I neither approve of or condone this budget as being good for Canadians as apposed to greatly assisting international bankers and investors.

PS: Why am I expected to pay for the fear shown over the myth of man-made climate change. I come from a long line of botanists who taught me the value of CO2 to the survival of the planet and how we are too close to the dangerously low proportion of CO2 in our atmosphere.

Budget Expense Definitions

The Honourable Francois-Phillipe Champagne

Canadian Minister of Finance

MP for Saint-Maurice – Champlain

Attendee at the WEF

9th October 2025

Minister,

I am hearing nonstop from you that there are now two ways that the Liberal Party of Canada, under the leadership of a has been banker and you, intend to spend the “way overburdened” Canadian taxpayers’ money.

The first way is the usual; the paying of an over bloated, and still growing almost daily, public service, with new branches being created to maybe someday do the work of those branches already in existence that has not been done for over a decade now.

The second way is by what you, and the banker, refer to as making “investments”.

Well now as your banker boss should be able to tell you an investment should provide a financial return within a stated time frame to be attractive enough to investors.  So, I suppose my question is what percentage of financial return will you be receiving into the Bank of Canada for these investments?  Since it is Canadian Taxpayers’ money you are “investing” we have every right to know and either approve of or disapprove of how you are gambling with our money.

As just one example the ArriveCan “investment” in Liberal Party friends netted us how much profit?

Long before your time and also that awkward time in the early part of this century (2008), the Bank of Canada financed just about everything the government did and returned to the finance minister the profits from those investments.  Now of course and largely due to the present PM the Bank of Canada is really nothing more than an inflation watchdog, adjusting interest rates to try and control that ever-rising inflation.  

However, the principle still remains that an investment by its very nature brings financial dividends to those who invest.   I trust that when you present the first budget for 18 months you will tell us what sort of financial profit you anticipate from these “investments” in language that is acceptable and believable not simply Liberal Party Guesswork and BS, and what you will do if that money is not returned to the Taxpayers through their Bank of Canada.

For over a decade now we have been going backwards as a country and I would really like my doubts at this government’s ability to actually do anything be proven wrong. 

FIFA Men’s World cup in Canada and the USA.

The Honourable Adam van Koeverden Secretary of State for Sports

MP for Burlington North – Milton West

26th August 2025

Re:2026

FIFA Men’s World cup in Canada and the USA.

I wrote to you on 12th August 2025 about the Davis cup match up with the genocidal state of Israel and heard nothing back and see no intention from you to act in any way.  You will not be anti-semantic but you will be realistic in wanting to play only against honourable opponents.

Your lack of any action indicates to me that you will do nothing if Israel manages to get into the select few countries which will wind up playing in Canada or the USA for the FIFA world cup next year.   You can at least make sure that they do not play in Canada against our national team and instead play in the USA where their genocide of Gaza is welcomed and condoned with military and logistic support.   OOOPs I forgot for a moment that we (the Canadian government, not the people) are also supplying them with ammunition and maybe even military personnel.  

However, that is the government’s choice not that of the Canadian people, and I am sure that Canadians would not like to see any team from Israel playing in Canada or against Canadian athletes.   

We are, unlike our government, not bound by the Zionist lobbies and IF you represent anyone in Canada at all you will take steps to enforce our sovereignty.  Sports teams from  genocidal countries should not be any more welcome that the leaders of such countries.

So far, I am waiting for you to uphold Canadian values rather than fear the consequences of standing up for Canadians.

Imagine if you were a Russian Athlete and knew that your country had come the aid of fellow Russian speakers whose lands had been invaded for 10 years by Nazis backed by the USA, and that as your soldiers won land back they were rebuilding what had been destroyed, roads, hospitals, schools, homes etc., and yet you are denied the ability to take part in competitions because you are facing down the USA and Canada .  Worst yet another country which is conducting genocide and has almost completely destroyed the Palestinian strip of Gaza, wages war with Lebanon, Syria, Iran and Yemen and yet is welcomed with open arms because the USA and Canada must approve of genocide as they help arm it.

I know if I were in that position I would refuse to take part in any competition in which either the USA or Canada were participants and my honour and self-respect would be intact.

Please make me approve of your actions for once.

Jeremy Arney

Yet more Canadian Hypocrisy when will it stop?

Letter sent with copy to all Canadian MPs

​The Honourable Adam van Koeverden

Secretary of State for Sports

MP for Burlington North – Milton West

Davis Cup.

From the Canadian Government Broadcasting Corporation.

Jamie Strashin · CBC Sports · Posted: Feb 24, 2023 

“On the one-year anniversary of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the head of the Canadian Olympic Committee maintains there is no place for Russian and Belarusian athletes at next summer’s Olympic Games in Paris, but acknowledges the emerging reality that it may happen.”

The cause of this was of course the rescue operation conducted by Russia to assist the Russian speaking people of the Donbass who actually wanted to be Russians again and not to be killed by the Nazi battalions of the Ukrainian army sponsored by the USA, Canada and the rest of the subservient NATO which had been happening from 2014 until 2022.

Result – no Russian team at the Olympics – not only unfair to Russians but to the rest of the world’s athletes who were not competing against a full deck.

Bring it forward to today:

Just Peace Advocates

Aug 10, 2025, 11:18 AM 

Tennis Canada, ITF, and the relevant Canadian governmental authorities need to cancel Team Canada’s match against Team Israel


Halifax will host a Davis Cup World Group I tie between Canada and Israel on Sept. 12-13, at the Halifax Scotiabank Centre.

An Israeli team is allowed to take part in a international tennis tournament in spite of their nation being responsible for genocide in Gaza, attacks against the West Bank, Lebanon, Syria and Iran which of course are all supported by Canada through continued armaments shipments to Israel.  The hypocrisy here is in full compliance with the useless, ineffectual, compromised, principle less and WEF owned Canadian Government with flapping elbows and no principles on view.

I would like to see all Canadian tennis players refuse to take part if Canada maintains its position of allowing the match to happen, even if it means forfeiting the match.  Regretfully this would result in all players losing whatever grants or support they are receiving from said government, which is of course terrified of being labelled anti semantic.   

As Secretary of State for Sports, and past athlete of some note, I ask you to put yourself in the position that our tennis players find themselves and make a decision based on what you would do.  I recommend that we refuse to take part against the Israeli tennis players and if you say that is unfair to the Israelis then consider how unfair Canada was to the Russian athletes in the Olympics.    Canadians will be watching how you handle this and so will the rest of the world

Oh no, that’s all we need.

.

From The STRAITSTIMES

Published Jul 30, 2025, 03:58 AM

Updated Jul 30, 2025, 03:58 AM

World Court climate opinion turns up the legal heat on governments

“The International Court of Justice, also known as the World Court, last Wednesday laid out the duty of states to limit harm from greenhouse gases and to regulate private industry. 

It said failure to reduce emissions could be an internationally wrongful act and, found that treaties such as the 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change should be considered legally binding.

                                     ****

What wonderful news for those who make money of the hoax of man-made climate change. Those who for some reason think that CO2 is going to burn up the planet well they can celebrate too.

But for me it is another sign that the law has turned into a gigantic ASS.  Just one hundred years ago the planet was hotter than it is today, and that is in spite of the huge tracts of earth that have been turned into concrete or asphalt, where cities create heat with huge buildings and masses of people, and yet we are still cooler than even 100 years ago. 

What about I million years or maybe 10 million years ago? Were there voices at this so-called court to talk about that and if there were did the court simply ignore them?

But I decided to dig a bit, and this is what I found,

Opinion or ruling?

In July 2025, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued an “advisory opinion” stating that countries have a legal obligation to protect the climate and prevent harm to it. The court emphasized that climate change poses an “urgent and existential threat”. “This ruling” clarifies that countries must uphold international climate laws, including the Paris Agreement‘s goal of limiting warming to 1.5°C. “The ICJ’s opinion” also suggests that countries harmed by climate change could potentially seek reparations. 

Here’s a more detailed breakdown:

  • Obligation to protect the climate:

The “ICJ affirmed” that countries have a legal duty to protect the climate system and prevent climate change-related harm. 

  • 1.5°C target is legally binding:

The “court clarified” that the Paris Agreement’s goal of limiting global warming to 1.5°C is a legally binding benchmark. 

  • Stringent climate plans required:

The “ICJ stated” that national climate plans must be “stringent” and aligned with the 1.5°C target. 

  • Potential for reparations:

“The opinion” suggests that countries harmed by climate change may be entitled to reparations or compensation. 

  • Increased legal pressure on governments:

The “ICJ’s ruling” strengthens legal arguments for climate action and may increase the success rate of domestic climate litigation. 

  • Fossil fuel phaseout:

“The ruling” is expected to increase pressure on governments to phase out fossil fuels and end subsidies. 

  • Landmark legal precedent:

“The ICJ’s opinion” is a landmark decision, providing a stronger legal foundation for climate action and holding countries accountable for their climate obligations. 

The ICJ determined that the 1.5°C temperature target is legally binding under the Paris Agreement and that all states, in particular the largest emitters, must take ambitious mitigation measures in line with the best available science. “The opinion” arrives 6 years after a group of 27 students from the University of the South Pacific began campaigning on this issue, and more than 2 years since the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) adopted a resolution requesting the “advisory opinion”.

While the “ICJ’s opinion” itself is not binding—neither on itself nor on domestic courts—it carries considerable legal weight and political legitimacy.

The ICJ has now “authoritatively interpreted international law” in a way that strengthens the legal foundation for ambitious, science-based climate action

(I highlighted the obvious contradictions.)

That may be but it has not stated or given an opinion of those who claim that this whole thing is a hoax based on Al Gore and his “Inconvenient Truth”.  They did not give an opinion on the concept that the planet has gone through more climate changes over the last few million years than any one of these brilliant manmade climate change advocates can or even will imagine.

What is regrettable to me is that those who sought to get justification or applause for their mania will claim that this “Opinion” or “Ruling” will claim victory for them and say that they now have a world court’s opinion that their hoax is real.   

Well yes, the hoax is real but the sad thing is that if they actually manage to do away with CO2 they too will perish, and probably claim to the end that they were right and the plants and sea let them down.

As an addition I read an article in Macleans titled Canada in 2060

Canada in the Year 2060

Summers lost to fire and smoke. Biblical floods. Dying forests. Retreating coasts. Economic turmoil and political unrest. It’s going to be a weird century. Here’s what it will look like—and how Canada can get through it.

BY ANNE SHIBATA CASSELMAN

And I confess I was laughing quite hard because by 2050 there will be no CO2, so there will be no oxygen so there will be no people to witness what they were predicting.  Oh, there might be a bit of oxygen floating over from China or even the USA, but not enough to sustain Canadians, who will have nothing to eat anyway.  But I realized that this will never happen in time because my grandchildren and great grandchildren and their generations will put a stop to this absolute crazy foolishness.

Yes, it’s time to re-read my copy of 1066 and all that.

Letter sent to the so called Public Safety Minister for Canada, another political appointee with zero experience or pizzazz

· 

Dear public safety minister Gary Anandasangaree,

Anthony Housefather is a Zionist who believes that Palestinian men, women and children who survive the bombings and missiles should be killed as a sport by IDF snipers. This shows the mentality and complete callousness of this Zionist in particular, but it appears that most MPs are in agreement with him for fear of being called antisemitic. I have no such fears as i am anti Zionist killers like Housefather and not my Jewish friends, they like me are appalled by the IDF and Netanyahu. Most of them no longer wear the small hats as a sign of rebellion against what their religion has become.

As a sign of moral inferiority, Anthony Housefather has called on the government to block Canadians from being able to see Bob Vylan perform. Please reject the request as someone of his (Housefather’s) ilk has nor earned the right to dictate what Canadians should be allowed to see, hear or do.

I do also realise that the entire Canadian Parliament is at the beck and call of the small hats lobby and most of us wonder how much money you have each been paid.

Seeking to deny artists a visa for scheduled concerts is a naked effort to suppress freedom of expression. Any suggestion Bob Vylan is a threat to Canadians is absurd.

Justin Trudeau in particular and his government ignored the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Criminal Code of Canada and turned Canadian against Canadian deliberately. There is no point in turning to the AG and Justice Minister of Canada because he is way too busy waving his arms to even hold never mind read the Constitution and Charter.

The hypocrisy of Israel advocates in calling to suppress musicians denouncing a military committing genocide is also extraordinary. Recently, Israeli military cantor Noam Buskila, who speaks about fighting in Gaza, performed in Montreal. Similarly, former Israel Prime Minister Naftali Bennett, who once said “I’ve killed lots of Arabs in my life, and there’s no problem with that”, has spoken repeatedly in Canada. Other similar examples abound, but you are allowing the absurdity of blocking a musical duo.

Clearly we are governed (if that is the right word) by the inferiority riddled Zionist Lobby masquerading as Liberals with the backing of the remaining terrified MPs.

Don’t follow the Trump administration in trampling on basic liberal norms to defend Israel’s genocide. Let Canadians who so desire see Bob Vylan perform live

You do not have to approve any more than we have to approve of your pathetic actions..

Sincerely, but in complete disgust