Budget Expense Definitions

The Honourable Francois-Phillipe Champagne

Canadian Minister of Finance

MP for Saint-Maurice – Champlain

Attendee at the WEF

9th October 2025

Minister,

I am hearing nonstop from you that there are now two ways that the Liberal Party of Canada, under the leadership of a has been banker and you, intend to spend the “way overburdened” Canadian taxpayers’ money.

The first way is the usual; the paying of an over bloated, and still growing almost daily, public service, with new branches being created to maybe someday do the work of those branches already in existence that has not been done for over a decade now.

The second way is by what you, and the banker, refer to as making “investments”.

Well now as your banker boss should be able to tell you an investment should provide a financial return within a stated time frame to be attractive enough to investors.  So, I suppose my question is what percentage of financial return will you be receiving into the Bank of Canada for these investments?  Since it is Canadian Taxpayers’ money you are “investing” we have every right to know and either approve of or disapprove of how you are gambling with our money.

As just one example the ArriveCan “investment” in Liberal Party friends netted us how much profit?

Long before your time and also that awkward time in the early part of this century (2008), the Bank of Canada financed just about everything the government did and returned to the finance minister the profits from those investments.  Now of course and largely due to the present PM the Bank of Canada is really nothing more than an inflation watchdog, adjusting interest rates to try and control that ever-rising inflation.  

However, the principle still remains that an investment by its very nature brings financial dividends to those who invest.   I trust that when you present the first budget for 18 months you will tell us what sort of financial profit you anticipate from these “investments” in language that is acceptable and believable not simply Liberal Party Guesswork and BS, and what you will do if that money is not returned to the Taxpayers through their Bank of Canada.

For over a decade now we have been going backwards as a country and I would really like my doubts at this government’s ability to actually do anything be proven wrong. 

The myth that the Government of Canada is a new one

Anyone listening to the histrionics emanating from the Canadian House of Ill Repute concerning the current Liberal Government of Canada being new one can easily see that is a lie.

Real questions asked either in what passes for debate or during the “Oral Questions” waste of time, determine that no answers are given to questions and in some cases front benchers such as Mackinnon or Champagne will not only avoid the question but heap contempt and ridicule upon the questioner.  I have watched two weeks of Oral Questions now and am not able to recall one question being actually answered.  Since this has been the pattern since 2015 I can hardly call this a new government. Oh wait a moment I recall one answer of NO, can’t remember who but it was the only real answer I heard.

Yes, I agree that the elementary school drama teacher devotee of Klaus Schwab and his WEF has luckily been replaced but his replacement, the no taxpaying banker from Europe (also a WEF devotee), with a suspected passion for the destruction of Canada and a blind passion for the man-made climate change hoax is hardly what we needed.

There have been in my life a few people who make the short hairs in the back of my head stand up and he is one of them.  I trust neither his word nor his motives.  He has assembled a front bench of the worst of the last cabinet and some new ones who have absolutely no clue about their portfolios.

To cap it all off we have had since the Canadian confederation in 1867 ( since added to by additional provinces and territories) several layers of governments each with its own economical responsibilities, and the 1982 version with the included Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (completely ignored by the Trudeau version of terrorists).

The federal government. the provincial legislatures and the municipal councils.  Each has their own economical responsibilities, based on local taxation, and each one supposedly controlled by its residents, as is suggested by democracy.   Regretfully that democracy has not existed in Canada ever.

But now this converted banker wants to create one economy for Canada!!!    “One instead of thirteen” he boasts, but he is forgetting all the municipal councils and indigenous councils across Canada. What a strange thing to do unless the idea is to make it easier to give Canada to the WEF.   Yet, every liberal in our house of ill repute sems to be championing this absurd idea as if it was possible without a constitutional change. 

It sounds like another Liberal pipe dream with a dry ending.

They are also boasting a tax cut to 22 million Canadians that is half the population (?) which amounts in my case to half my weekly grocery bill.    What makes me laugh is that he wants this to happen by Canada Day 2025 ?????

There is just over three weeks to get it read twice, debated, taken to committee (which hasn’t even been appointed yet) and then read/debated again and sent to the senate, and then after the same process in the senate passed and sent to the GG for approval.  Good luck.

Maybe he will learn that trying to get things done quickly in a dysfunctional parliament is a great deal harder than canceling funds and livelihoods in a bank with a simple stroke of a pen.

I also notice that almost everything he says is an admission that the last decade has been one of abject failure which he now comes in on a long white limo to fix.   I agree with the decade of failure but I do not believe he is not the man to fix it.

Maybe all new Bills should be entitled “The Banker’s Bill to:….”

Jeremy

One Canadian Economy?

3rd June 2025.

Open Letter to Mark Carney,

Leader of the Liberal Party of Canada.

Mr. Carney,

I know you have recently returned from Europe and may well be rusty in the way this country was set up but I feel I would be remiss if I did not remind you that the PM cannot change the Constitution of Canada to suit his needs as a banker or self proclaimer saviour of the country sent by the WEF. 

Your proclamation that there will be one economy in Canada completely goes against the division of responsibilities between Federal and Provincial rights and duties concerning the taxation of the Canadian people, including the rights of taxation by local town councils.  One economy would not allow for these. I am amazed that your Attorney General has not bought this to your attention, but then it is after all a Liberal government and the Rule of Law, respect, truth and openness do not apply to you, it would appear, any more than the Criminal Code applied to your predecessor.

Setting up a “free trade” system among provinces is not creating one economy and I am afraid that just like Trudeau you are imagining yourself as a Canadian god and by your language you are trying to create false realities.

You managed to successfully convince many frightened old Canadians to support you in the recent election, but I am also a senior and I do not fear Trump, who actually amuses me, and the more you feed his reality show host persona the more you urge him on;  but I do fear that your actions are smoke and mirrors and are going to do the opposite of what you have promised.

You do not have my trust and you absolutely do not have my consent to meddle with the Canadian Constitution.

Post 2025 Federal Election in Canada

8th May 2025.

I was idly half asleep this afternoon prior to my nap after watching the Russian 80-year celebrations of the ending of the Great Patriotic War (WW2 ) in Berlin in 1945 to which there were no representatives present from the allies of that time, when I had this thought about things happening in threes.

The threes are not related to the above celebration at all.

“When the whole world is running towards a cliff, he who is running in the opposite direction appears to have lost his mind.” – C.S. Lewis

These three started in 2015 when an upstart third party drama teacher from an elementary school in Montreal made a promise to all Canadians that 2015 would be the very last first-past-the-post election in Canada, and we bought it and elected him to be the next PM.  Well, we all know how that worked out because the mandate given to the committee was flawed. They were supposed to come back with a recommendation but they did not do so, instead thanks to Scott Reid and his determination to hold a referendum there was no consensus of any kind on a new system, giving Trudeau the out he needed to go back on his solemn promise.

The truth often evades being recognized due to its utter incredibility  Pericles?

Next comes number two: the total scam of covid 19, which made a huge amount of money for Acuitas Therapeutics, out of the UBC which came up with the method for injecting a toxic, untested mRNA jab into people which the whole world mandated one way or another.  40% of this entity is owned by the Trudeau Family Foundation so 40% of the profits from a world-wide system equals a lot of money.  Naturally with all this money at stake the PM was not only a promoter of this jab but his hate speech towards those who opposed his dismantling of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms through the Freedom Convoy, lead to the peaceful protest in Ottawa which he absolutely refused to address or even listen to. This is one of the things he said:

“Today in the House all MPs unanimously condemned the antisemitic, islamophobia, anti-black racism, homophobia and transphobia that we have ever seen on display in Ottawa over the past number of days. Together. Let’s keep working to make Canada more inclusive.”   (Actually that was a lie as no such condemnation was made at all in the House that day) but the hate speech was ignored by the Attorney General (the defendfer of the Crinimal Code), as usual.

This whole mess ended eventually in an illegal application of the Emergencies Act, violent military suppression of peaceful protesters and seizing of citizens’ bank accounts.  No actions taken against this absolute evil use of power, and really none was anticipated because this PM was above the rule of law in Canada.

Kissinger quote from a speech to the WHO Council on Eugenics,February 25th 2009: “Once the herd accepts mandatory vaccinations, It’s GAME OVER. They will accept anything – Forcible blood or organ donation- “For the greater good”. We can genetically modify children and sterilize them- “For the greater good”. Control sheep minds and you control the herd. Vaccine makers stand to make billions. And many of you in this room are investors. It’s a BIG win/win.

“Do not mess in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy when roasted, and taste good with ketchup.” Polyphemus ?

Now we come to number three.  At a time when Trudeau was soo disliked by the people of Canada that it was apparent that the liberals might even not obtain party status, Jasmeet Singh (desperate for his pension) would still not bring the government down (although doing so would have probably guaranteed his pension through reelection) Trudeau did the usual liberal tactic, delay via proroguing parliament and resigning at the same time.  Great timing as TRUMP, the ever-threatening presence from the USA, was making some very strange speeches and quite clearly interfering in our forthcoming electoral process.  Out of the wings comes the unctuous, smug, “carbon tax Carney” to be greeted like a hero and made interim PM. The rest is history, in that there were more in the way of irregularities than ever before.  For example 86 fake candidates were approved by elections Canada in one riding (Carlton) with only 100 people giving them all permission to run.  I am told that in the byelection in Alberta they are proposing to have 200 fake candidates and they will if EC do not smarten up.

I am not blaming those who are resolved to rule, only those who show an even greater readiness to submit.  –     Thucydides

This result is heralding the new carbon taxes to come (including a proposed tax on home equity) and just like before these taxes will benefit the new PM financially.  That is what he is here for, to cripple Canada and make more money for himself.

I am still wondering what the pay back is for the thousands of politicians around the world to promote the hoax of man-made climate change. Is it monetary or just recognition of being stupid?  (Maybe in their minds it’s not being thought of as being stupid – who knows)

Climate change is real enough as it has been happening for millions of years without ANY assistance from Mankind, and yet here we still are.  Education on how to adapt to what is coming that we cannot change would be a much better idea than the absurd concept that a gas which is 0.04% of the earth’s atmosphere is going to end all life on the planet.

What we really need on this planet are people who are less interested in war and making personal monetary gain from us all they that cannot eat, and are more interested in enjoying and making the most of what we already have.

19th Century Cree saying      “Only when the last tree has died, and the last fish has been caught, and the last river has been poisoned, will they realize that money cannot be eaten”.