Monthly Archives: April 2026

Lies and deception in Canadian House of Ill Repute

Steven MacKinnon

Minister of Transport and Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

WEF Attendee

MP for Gatineau

25th April 2026

From Hansard

From Oral Questions on 23th April.2026.

In response to a question by Melissa Lantsman (Thornhill, CPC):  

Hon. Steven MacKinnon (Minister of Transport and Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, Lib.):  

    Mr. Speaker, I would ask the member to table immediately a list of the cuts she would like to make, and we will look into that.

Again in reply to Jason Groleau (Beauce, CPC):  

Hon. Steven MacKinnon (Minister of Transport and Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, Lib.):  

    Mr. Speaker, as I just indicated to the member’s colleague, we are more than willing to hear what cuts the member opposite might propose, and we look forward to receiving his suggestions.

And then to: Luc Berthold (Mégantic—L’Érable—Lotbinière, CPC):  

Hon. Steven MacKinnon (Minister of Transport and Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, Lib.):  

    Where is the document that the member intends to table to provide a detailed list of the inflationary expenses he would like to debate here in the House?

In response to the Thursday Question:

Hon. Steven MacKinnon (Minister of Transport and Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, Lib.):  

    Mr. Speaker, I have taken careful note of those questions from my hon. colleague, and perhaps I could offer a challenge in return. If he could work with his colleagues over the weekend so that we get a list, a very precise list, of all of the things that constitute, in their minds, inflationary spending, we would certainly rush to agree to have them table that document and would take a look at it before the Minister of Finance rises next week and gives his spring economic update.

Hon. Andrew Scheer:  

    Mr. Speaker, because the government House leader referenced it, I understand he has just made a commitment that he would allow us to bring that document into the House and accept its tabling. I will take him up on that and make sure we get him that list. I do hope he will not just provide unanimous consent to the tabling of that document but that he also gives it to the Minister of Finance so that we can finally get the Liberals to stop causing the inflation that is causing so much hardship for Canadians.

From Hansard 24th April Oral Questions

Two more responses from the Liberal House Leader in his usual condescending and contentious way.

Luc Berthold (Mégantic—L’Érable—Lotbinière, CPC):  

    He voted against all that, despite his big heart. We have challenged the Conservatives to tell us what cuts they are proposing. Will my colleague table in the House of Commons a list of the cuts the Conservative Party is proposing?

Kelly Block (Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek, CPC):  

     Yesterday, I asked Conservatives to table a detailed list of spending cuts they propose, because they talk about inflationary spending. I hope my hon. colleague can help me.

                                      ********

After all that at the end of oral Questions on 24th April this incredible event took place:

The Deputy Speaker:  

 That brings question period to an end.

 I have a point of order from the member for Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands—Rideau Lakes.

Michael Barrett:  

Mr. Speaker, I would like to seek unanimous consent to table a document detailing the cuts Conservatives would make.

    An hon. member: No.

So, MacKinnon why did you ask for something 5 times in two days when you had no intention of allowing that document to be tabled?

I believe that is called deceiving the House or put another way lying to the House which has been the practice of the government of Canada since 2015 and only appears to be getting more blatant as days go by under this Visiting Banker.

I am appalled that someone who is paid by taxpayers has such utter contempt for us and shows it on a daily basis. I do not condone either your attitude nor your lies.

Jeremy Arney

Saanichton BC

What’s with Religions today?

I was born in the UK and “Christened” into the Church of England when still young enough to yell when doused with a watery cross. As soon as I could read, I was “volunteered” into the local church choirs even though my singing left much to be desired. At my first boarding school we walked a mile up hill to attend the church service every Sunday, and at Lancing College we attended Chapel every day and twice on Sunday.

Even with all this “brainwashing” things happened to me that caused me to think for myself (which I was taught to do at Lancing) and I realized that there were way too many “gods” for any one to be the one real god and as a result I eventually rejected them all and became an atheist which I remain.

Today all religions seem to be under attack because they differentiate between antisemitic and anti Zionism.  Carrie Boller was thrown off the White House Religious Liberty Committee because she refused to accept that being Roman Catholic was to be antisemitic. The absolute absurdity of this is patently obvious.  Yes, that is in the USA but this country called Canada and it’s parliament is following the Zionist playbook with absolute obedience to the Zionist Lobby.  This means that if someone like me says anything about my utter contempt for Zionists and the ugly genocidal, yet inferiority riddled, state of Israel can soon be arrested and likely jailed for those comments.

                                “Bill C-9:

“Civil liberties groups including the Canadian Civil Liberties Association have also raised concerns about the bill, arguing it could criminalize peaceful protest and silence unpopular expression.

Justice Minister Sean Fraser, who sponsored the bill and brokered the deal with the Bloc, has pushed back saying the new legislation won’t “criminalize faith.”   

Since I do not trust this Minister one inch farther than I can throw him under water, I have great misgivings about his assertion even if his arms are waving like a scarecrow in a gale. I am also very concerned that he states it is in complete compliance with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.  Anything that restricts genuine freedoms cannot be in compliance unless one is a Liberal fanatic devotee of our visiting banker.

There will be many who think I am crazy and maybe I am but I cannot accept that so many people are willing to limit what people can believe.  I, on the other hand, have absolutely no problem with anyone believing whatever they wish and wish them well and good luck with what is coming their way.  

What amuses me, in a way, is that this attitude is more Christian than most Christians’ belief and behaviour.