Monthly Archives: August 2023

PRESIDENTIAL DOUBLE SPEAK

Once upon a time a sitting president of the USA uttered these words as if he not only believed them to be true but also expected the rest of the world to believe them.

Some nations may be able to turn a blind eye to atrocities in other countries. The United States of America is different.   Wherever people long to be free, they will find a friend in the United States…    Obama’

He went on to say:

For generations, the United States of America has played a unique role as an anchor of global security and as an advocate for human freedom. Mindful of the risks and costs of military action, we are naturally reluctant to use force to solve the world’s many challenges. But when our interests and values are at stake, we have a responsibility to act.

“A dead thing can go with the stream, but only a living thing can go against it.”      —G.K. Chesterton

So while this absolute “doublespeak” sinks in let me remind you of what was happening at that time..

The USA was about to use NATO and the World Bank to attack Libya and turn it into a stone age pile of rubble. Apart from the ever-present CIA there were no American troops to spill their blood in that desert turned in to an arable area. But what followed was as savage a beating as any schoolyard bully ever inflicted on a helpless girl.

I am still ashamed that Canada had such a leading role with the avid encouragement from Stephen Harper and John Baird.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/libya-mission-will-include-canada-until-end-pm-vows-1.1018327

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/libya-s-weapons-must-be-safeguarded-baird-says-1.1077850

(from which comes this quote:

“The school year is starting so they’ll have to pay teachers. They’ll have to pay for the electricity, for the water systems, all the other public services that are essential to a stable and free society. So we’re urging them to do it as expeditiously as possible and putting our weight behind others who are making similar calls.”

(Hard to do really as we managed to bomb all the hospitals, schools, water supply and other things except of course the oil refineries. Did we rush to help fix them again? Not a chance. )

From:

https://www.quora.com/Was-Gaddafi-a-good-leader-Why-or-why-not

Kosmas Aitolos

Was Muammar Gaddafia a good leader?

It depends on what is considered good. Jihadists would not call him good as he was against jihadist Islam. A reasonable person would call him good as he gave his people an excellent standard of living , the average Libyan having a better and higher standard of living than the average American.

An intellectual or Progressive Libyan probably thought him bad because of the one party state ,but I bet they now pine for him ,compared to what Nato-America has given them by butchering Gaddafi….

(Based on the UN statistics in 2009 Libya was one of the best countries in human development, education and healthcare.)

After Gaddafi unfortunately most Libyan youths joined militias and many of them were killed in civil wars. Many of the schools which were built in Gaddafi ‘s time became prisons to Libyans. The human rights had the worst records ever. The girls can’t feel safe to go to universities and their families can’t leave them to pursue their studies out of their cities. According to the UN statistics in 2019 Libya scored 115 in education, healthcare and human development compared to 55 in 2009.

All these can show what Gaddafi is in terms of leadership in the national level. All in all the man changed his country from a state needing help to a country who helps and influences other nations such as Africa. When he died Gaddafi was the leader of African union and he was planning to united its currency, army, and economy.

However this was not allowed as appeared in Clinton’s emails recently. The problem with Gaddafi, he was trying to wake up the African sleeping giant which will be very dangerous for America and NATO. They are pretty sure that if Africa stands it will wipe the face of the earth as it has all the resources. Therefore, all the powerful nations want to control it as main resources and market.

This is the main reason behind assassination of Gaddafi and that why he was bad leader.

(or promoted as such).

(He also warned that the African migrants would be a problem if he was taken out and he was right)

So what was Obama actually saying? 

“We have and always will interfere with the workings of any nation that asks for help, and if they do not ask we will give them that help anyway as long as they have something worth taking that we want.”

This of course is my interpretation and judging by what the USA (and NATO allies such as Canada) have done since WW2 I would claim that is pretty accurate.  In order to be the bully you must first bully the defenseless to gain a reputation.

Since the US economy was tottering another war was needed and so a phony proxy NATO war was launched in 2022 as a growth of the civil one started by the USA in 2014 in Ukraine.  (Some will say that the Russians illegally invaded Ukraine, and if that was the case why have they stopped at the edge of the Donbas?) The idea was of course to give masses of out-of-date armaments to the Nazi government there and allow the US industrial military complex to get into high gear to make new weapons.   How is that working out?   Really well as Ukraine is now attacking Russia almost daily and how long will the Russian patience last, I wonder.  That is another thing NATO wants – loss of patience.  And was a promise not made that US weapons would not be used against Russia?  Of course, but any agreement NATO make with Russia is as invalid as the fake concept of  western democracy.

Now of course we have a situation arising in Africa, which almost certainly would not have happened if Gaddafi was still alive, and as usual the US (and Canada) are trying to dictate to these smaller African countries with essential resources what they should do and will be using their favourite first weapon – sanctions anyone? 

Meanwhile the countries of the world which are tired of being bullied are gathering to create their own trading and monetary systems.  What do we hear about that in Canada?  Nothing as the CBC is, it appears, unaware that BRICS even exists.

Gonna be an interesting last half of 2023 me thinks!

Jeremy

“The truth is like a Lion. You don’t have to defend it. Let it loose. It will defend itself.”    St. Augustine

How out of touch can you get?

I received this piece of propaganda and when I had stopped fuming, I found I had to respond.

(from) MélanieJoly <reply@action.liberal.ca> 

We’re able to grow our movement because of supporters like you, Jeremy. (I have not contributed one dime to them yet.)

Grassroots supporters are at the heart of all the work we’re able to achieve for Canadians. Together, with the help of Canadians like you, we’re building a Canada where future generations can thrive.

But when we’re building a better future, the work we do today matters.

Justin Trudeau and our Liberal team are staying focused on making life more affordable (1), accelerating the fight against climate change (2), strengthening our public health care system (3), building safer communities (4), and growing an economy that works for all Canadians (5).

1

I am quite certain that even the rich are noticing that everything has become more expensive in the last 8 years, and that it is harder to find good help at the slave labour rate called our minimum wage. So the question is : More affordable for whom?

2

Climate change has been going on for millions of years and we are still here. Can anyone tell me how much extra carbon has been released by the burning of all those trees?  Some of them have been sequestering carbon for centuries but no one mentions the release volume.

3

Our public health care system is without enough doctors, nurse practioners, nurses, hospitals and family clinics, and all this government thinks about is throwing money at it and blaming the provinces.  The final straw may prove to have been the covid flu fiasco with all its illegal federal coercions on so many levels driving the above practitioners away from medicine by unelected, unaccountable provincial colleges of medical ptofessionals. These same “colleges” are making it damn near impossible for immigrant medical professions to get work here in Canada.

4

Safer communities means catch and release of dangerous criminals but imprisonment of peaceful protestors including faith leaders under the charge of mischief. Meanwhile criminal hate speech is totally ignored and hatred and division has increased under the leadership of this fake feminist along with total support of apartheid systems both here and abroad..

5.

The only person who seems to think the economy works for all Canadians is the finance minister who believes that billions of our tax money are better spent on her Nazi buddies’ bank accounts than on starving, out of work, homeless and sick Canadians.

Other than that, I would say things are just peachy for the out of touch liars called Liberals.

Perhaps Ms. Joly would be better spending less time in Ukraine and more looking at what is happening in the rest of the BRICKS world before it is too late for us to be involved – though I am pretty sure they don’t want us as long as we are slaves to the WEF and USA.

But they are encouraging all countries that believe in a peaceful-get-along-with-each-other-world to join.

Too bad we are not there yet.

 

Jeremy

Sunrise in BC

CMAJ on the recent Plandemic

I am not a medically trained person, have little scientific knowledge but am a pactitioner of logical thinking, so when I was working on my computer with the CBC on as background noise and I heard about this report being published I watched and listened and was so appalled at what I heard I went looking for the report and here is what I think about most of it.

My comments highlighted in bold italics.

Open Access

CMAJ

The evolution of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in Canada: a time-series study, 2020–2023

Interpretation

During the prevaccine and vaccine roll-out intervals, relatively few people in Canada had evidence of humoral immunity to SARS-CoV-2 from an earlier infection.(How can you possibly know this?  Did you test for it and how, or are you guessing? Or are you simply making excuses for not knowing an unknowable, though SRS-Cov has been around for centuries previously known as colds and the flu?) This changed rapidly during the Omicron era; by September 2022, most of the population had detectable antibodies from infection. The rise in infection-induced humoral immunity occurred rapidly across all geographical regions and age groups in Canada. This rapid rise in seropositivity owing to infection occurred despite the roll-out of vaccines in 2021, which led to high rates of vaccine-induced antibodies (how could a gene therapy induce antibodies against a flu virus?) detected across the country,7 protecting most people in Canada from severe illness and death (from what exactly?).7 However, this high vaccine coverage did not prevent the unprecedented transmission and epidemic growth of the Omicron variant in late 2021 and early 2022.8,9 Given the immune evasion and high transmissibility of the Omicron variant,10 most people in Canada now have infection-acquired immunity and vaccine-induced immunity, ushering in an era of hybrid immunity.     It is amazing to me that medical “experts” still believe this unscientific  propaganda nonsense about gene therapy being a vaccination against a virus.  

The rapid rise in infection seen in many countries with high vaccine coverage is explainable, in part, by the limited effectiveness of the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain–based vaccines in preventing infection with the Omicron variant.16 This immune evasion, combined with the high transmissibility of the Omicron variant, allowed the epidemic to spread rapidly.  (Bullshit, it was just a slightly different version of the flu and the mRNA jabs were not ever vaccinations.  How can the CMAJ still expect us to believe that? Plus the damage done by the inducement of spike proteins in the jabbed helped to make them susceptible to this flu variant).

Although the Omicron wave caused similar increases in infection-induced humoral immunity in multiple countries, the implications for population immunity may vary, owing to differences in the sequence and timing of vaccination and infection in each jurisdiction. In Canada, before the Omicron era, most people had been vaccinated, but not infected. During the Omicron wave, most of the population were then infected, likely producing hybrid immunity that potentially could protect against infection for months.17,18 before the Omicron era, most people had been vaccinated, (How could a non vaccination aid with immunity  in any way?  Also strange that after such a high jabbed rate Omicron took off like a normal flu.)

However, antibody levels also differ within Canada across geographical regions and age groups, likely a result of factors that we did not measure (e.g., occupation, booster vaccination status, comorbid conditions). Periodic serosurveillance in the general population in Canada, as well as vulnerable populations, will be important to track waning of serological markers.  (Why did you not measure those things?  Did you not want to know the answer?)

We believe that the lessons learned from our results include a need for Canada to approach pandemic-related problems in a multidisciplinary manner, aligning expertise in public health and pandemic responses with input from the broader scientific community. Although there is a need in a pandemic to rapidly develop vaccines that target a pathogen broadly, control spread and mitigate impacts, it is difficult to fully control pathogens that mutate rapidly through vaccination alone (although vaccination markedly decreased the severity of illness from those infected with SARS-CoV-2)(Prove it). (The concept that gene altering therapy should receive immediate approval from a body (Health Canada) subject to orders from their investors (big pharma) rather than the people of Canada is non only faulty and dangerous but also very unscientific) Measurement and analysis of antibodies to vaccination and infection provide crucial information for clinicians and policy-makers, particularly when rapid emergence of mutations drastically changes interpretation of other sources of surveillance data, such as confirmed infections, hospital admissions and deaths. Although currently challenging to conduct at scale, assays that can give a broader overall picture of immunity, such as measures of cell-mediated immunity and neutralizing antibodies, could further extend our ability to monitor and understand the effects of vaccination and infection.

(I cannot understand why a supposedly august medical body remains fixated on the idea that a gene therapy constitutes a vaccination.  I know you have altered the definition of vaccination to include gene therapy but that is semantics designed to protect yourselves from ridicule. “Multidisciplinary” means more than just the propaganda dogma which we were subjected to during this particular time, and instead of sidelining any scientific proposals or treatments from the “broader scientific community” not conforming to that propaganda they should at least have been taken under advisement.)

Many of the challenges encountered in this study were a result of the lack of coordinated, ongoing serosurveillance capacity in Canada. We were able to bring together many estimates of seroprevalence to describe broad trajectories of population seroprevalence. However, routine serosurveillance — ideally with individual-level linkage to other data, such as testing and vaccination — would allow for a deeper understanding of the causal relationships between the timing and nature of immune system challenges and antibody levels in the population

(Good grief! The annual flus and colds have been around forever and you are still no closer to real-time vaccination than were the ancient Greeks and Romans.  They had a better idea of how to deal with a cold than the modern drug pushers – let it run its course.)

Conclusion

Most people in Canada were infected with SARS-CoV-2 for the first time during the Omicron era, after previously being vaccinated. The highest rates of seropositivity from infection were seen in younger age groups and provinces in Western Canada. As a result, many people in Canada have hybrid immunity against SARS-CoV-2, but variations by age and geography and the potential for waning antibody levels suggest that public health policy and clinical decisions will need to be tailored to local patterns of population immunity.   (An accurate summation of a false hypothesis)

Conclusion

Canada’s record thus far in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic compares favourably to most comparator nations for broad health outcomes, although adverse economic and social impacts are also apparent .(Really? These were all political instigations with absolutely no medical science on view, in fact real medical science was ignored and discarded as unscientific hysterics. Useless and unnecessary shut downs, masking, church and school closures and segregation were in direct contrast to corporate shopping centers and big box stores operations)  As the country continues through subsequent phases of the pandemic, careful collection and analysis of data are necessary, while acknowledging the limits of available indicators and comparisons. Leaders should share new findings with the public transparently and swiftly, and make strategic adjustments to reinforce measures that appear to be successful and to modify others as appropriate. 

As a final insult to our intelligence, you suggest that leaders break eons of practice and share things with us?  All we got from this so called pandemic was lectures and lies from Justin Trudeau, Teresa Tam, and here in BC Bonnie Henry which were totally political and un scientific. You must all live in gilded cages somewhere out in the ether

Who paid for this propaganda, I would really like to know

Jeremy

PUBLIC HEALTH AGENCY OF CANADA

The Honourable Mark Holland

Canadian Minister of Health

MP for Ajax, Ontario

I appreciate that you are new in this position and that there are things for you to catch up on, but I must express my concern over this handing over of our medical establishment to the WHO.

From the PHA of Canada website:

1.         Canada.ca

 2.        Public Health Agency of Canada

 3.        Emergency preparedness and response

Canada and the International Health Regulations (IHR):

Overview

The International Health Regulations (IHR) (2005) are binding on the World Health Organization (WHO) and 196 countries (known as States Parties), including Canada. (How are we bound in any way with an unelected body financed by Bill Gates and GAVI?)

The IHR, which came into force in 2007, require countries to work together for global health security. They are focused on addressing serious public health threats that have the potential to spread beyond a country’s borders to other parts of the world. Through the IHR, countries have agreed to build their capacities to detect, assess, report and respond to public health events.

The IHR aim to prevent, protect against, control and respond to the international spread of disease and other public health risks, while avoiding unnecessary interference with international traffic and trade.

(Whatever we do it must not affect the profits of big corporations eh?)  They’re also designed to reduce the risk of diseases spreading at international airports, ports and ground crossings.  (How will this be accomplished without interference?)

Other obligations established by the IHR require countries to, for example:

•           strengthen their national surveillance and response capacities

•           report certain public health events to WHO   (what events would that be?)

The IHR also establish a number of procedures that WHO must follow as the coordinating body. This makes the IHR a necessary public health instrument central to ensuring global health security.    (Why have these people not been elected by all the countries that belong to the WHO and why are they not drawn from those countries?  What is the point of having our own health officials – qualified or not – determine what happens here in Canada if we are going to kowtow to the WHO?)

Implementing the IHR in Canada

In Canada, the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) is the lead organization for implementing the IHR. PHAC is also Canada’s designated National IHR Focal Point (NFP). As the NFP, PHAC coordinates the implementation of the IHR on behalf of the Government of Canada.  (No they don’t, they implement it on behalf of the WHO.)

IHR activities are a shared responsibility. This means that Canada’s Health Portfolio, other federal departments and provincial/territorial governments support IHR implementation.  (In other words, we hand over our medical affairs to an unelected body which has no medical expertise but lots of big pharma connections – great!)

Canada implements the IHR under existing legislation, regulations, policies and agreements in place at both the federal and provincial/territorial levels.

The success of IHR implementation in Canada relies on ongoing collaboration by all partners to carry out surveillance, reporting, notification, verification, response and collaboration activities:

•           across the country and

•           at international points of entry (airports, ports and ground crossings)

Because legislation differs among federal and provincial/territorial governments, Canada has mechanisms, agreements and plans in place that enable national coordination. (What are those plans and when were we told about them?) This is particularly important during public health emergencies that require federal involvement.

It seems that whoever decided this has forgotten that health is a provincial responsibility; and when our politicians get involved, as with the Covid version of the flu, immense damage was done not only to Canada’s sovereignty but also to Canadian small businesses and way too many people who were illegally coerced into taking an unproven, experimental gene therapy injection, wearing useless masks, and the segregation of both family and church – except where big business was concerned, and the closure of schools.

It appears that not only were no lessons learned during that dark period in our recent history but that our leaders are rushing to repeat it.  This time however they are preparing to pass the responsibility over to the WHO.

Is this what Canadians want or is it simply the dictates of those in the control of external forces such as the WEF?

Which ever we have been there and done that and are not willing to do it again.

Jeremy Arney

Leader of the Canadian Action Party

Saanichton BC

Ps

Just to satisfy my curiosity I went to se if there was anything else to see about plans for national coordination and lo and behold I found that there is something called:

Blueprint for a Federated System for Public Health Surveillance in Canada, from the Pan-Canadian Public Health Network

Within that Network of unelected so-called medical experts there is the Council of Chief Medical Officers of Health, and the current chair is Bonnie Henry.  That tells me all I need to know about the PCPHN.

However, I did look at the “Blueprint” and was amazed at the depth that it has been analyzed and developed imagining that most of it came from the WHO which of course is the main benefactor.  There are soo many suppositions and contradictions within this blueprint I copied some of them and then decided that maybe if you really want to see them, look for yourself and don’t be biased by my thinking.

One thing that struck me is that there is nowhere in this blueprint for “opposing” thought. As was clearly shown in the covid flu panic anything that was not according to Justin, in our case, was vigorously opposed and dissenting voices were silenced as doctor after doctor and nurse after nurse either quit or were delicensed out of the profession.

Yes, the “blueprint” is mostly about surveillance (which in itself is an ethical problem when it comes to releasing information on medical matters) but surveillance should include all matters not just what big pharma want to have presented to increase their profits.

There is also the problem that way too many Canadians do not have a family doctor and only go to the hospital when something gets serious, so gathering information (surveillance) will essentially be a problem. 

The other aspect of this Blueprint is that all Provinces and Territories will have to sign on, and as Ontario is going to the private health care option (while still taking federal money) and Quebec is naturally against anything that they do no choose for themselves there will be a big problem here.

I wonder how much money was spent on developing this Blueprint and who paid for it?  I doubt that we got reimbursed by the WHO or the WEF

Lunatic Fringe or sheer insanity

From the Globe and Mail

Canada to attend conference on Ukraine in Saudi Arabia

STEVEN CHASE  SENIOR PARLIAMENTARY REPORTER

PUBLISHED AUGUST 4, 2023

“Jody Thomas, the national security adviser to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, is leading a Canadian delegation to Saudi Arabia for weekend talks among 40 countries trying to find a peaceful settlement to Russia’s war on Ukraine.

*****

China said on Friday that it would also send a senior official to the talks, but the forum will exclude Russia. (my highlight)

Ukrainian and Western diplomats hope attendees at the meeting in Jeddah will agree on key principles for a future peace settlement.”

“It was not the truth they wanted, but an illusion they could bear to live with”…..Anaïs Nin

It is typical I suppose of Canada that they would waste money sending some delegate or another to one of the most useless conferences yet this year.  Simply put how on earth would you, or even could you, expect anything solid to come from a one-way conference?    I mean really give me a break and allow me to be realistic; if a supposed antagonist is not there how could anything be settled.  It is almost as stupid as giving a gold medal to a man who calls himself Leah in a woman’s’ swimming event; actually, even more stupid and that’s saying something.

It seems that Canada is totally against the events that happened in Donbas in 2022 but not a word about those that happened with our help between 2014 and 2022.   The slaughter, rape, torture and killing of the Russian speaking women, men and children in the Donbas who didn’t want to be part of a Nazi Ukraine is perfectly acceptable to Canada and Canadians as coming to the aid of the downtrodden and terrorized is no longer in the Canadian psyche.  There was also the organ transplant market to be provided with organs of those Russian  “scum” of the Donbas. This Canadian government, which came into power shortly after the CIA inspired Maidan coup, totally supported all this with Canadian forces training of Nazis and no doubt providing weapons and probably doctors as well. I can believe that the Canadian government, which is no longer under Canadian people control, would willingly accept and do such things, but the Canadian people? 

Do they even know the facts? 

Even worse do they even care?

Are they aware of how much our Nazi lovers have donated, and continue to donate, to the Zelensky cause and bank accounts.?   While this government is more than willing to freeze peaceful Canadian protestors’ bank accounts, they are happy to enlarge those of the Ukrainian oligarchs.  Money we could very well spend on health care or housing for the new arrivals to Canada, or the poor and homeless whose number increases by the day, or the damage done by their actions over a strain of flu they called covid..

“Those who tell the stories rule society”…   Plato

Now of course we are going to lose what access we had to such information as only the government propaganda will be available through the CBC, CTV, Global etc., and ignorance will increase exponentially. 

“The truth often evades being recognized due to its utter incredibility”….. Pericles?

But then of course truth is what we are not supposed to hear or know about anymore.   Oher than of course if that truth is governmental truth which in our case means WEF, WHO or Bill Gates truth and has little to do with reality.

What a sad country we have become and the vast majority of Canadians have no idea because their heads are buried in the palms of their hands and the woke idea that somehow male and female humans no longer exist.

Jeremy

View from Down under

Here is an interesting perspective I found in my inbox and thought you might like:  Jeremy

From: NewZealandDoc from NewZealandDoc’s Newsletter <newzealanddoc@substack.com>
Sent: July 28, 2023 9:16 AM
Subject: Our Salamis: It’s Time

Open in app or online Our Salamis: It’s Time NEWZEALANDDOC JUL 28      SHARE  

Each day brings with it its measure of joy or travail. The noise of life hums along and practicalities absorb the attention of most of us, enough so that the profundity of alterations introduced by the covid operation may not quite be appreciated. Indeed, I cannot myself come to comprehend the depths and breadth of the iniquity visited upon us, though I can perceive the stigmata.
It bores me to have to repeat the litany of abuse to which we have been subjected – the lockdowns, masks, jab mandates and apartheid, the residual divisions between friends and family, the cheerful ‘protective’ State declaring itself to be unassailable and correct and now constantly hectoring – but it is worth repeating if only to remind us of the unparalleled extent of the operation. And it is also worth remarking upon the introduction of novel attempts at control, attempts that reach into bank accounts, once thought to be impregnably safe or, at least, impregnably protected from outright theft.
It seems, in fact, that nothing is protected these days – speech, thought, bodily integrity and medical choice, private property, gender, family, religion – and we astonishingly have come to accept the intrusions against any semblance of human autonomy as … as no surprise. The assault against identify and freedom has been so massive, so universal and so complete that is really impossible to fathom.  
As the death jab continues to visit harm and demise upon millions, an infrastructure is being built to ensure that opinions daring to dissent with the authorities may not only be censored but punished. And most ominous has been the abject compliance of those to whom we have entrusted our care and well-being – and here I am referring to medical professionals sworn to keep their patients’ welfare as their foremost priority who have abdicated their sacred responsibilities. The unthinking masses who have been fed and nurtured on mainstream propaganda for decades, formidably and unquestioningly in lock-step with their media, are a little less morally culpable.
Our enemy – the enemy that shills for ‘the science’ and digital ID passports, and that has indulged in an orgy of censorship whenever it encounters a critical voice – is lawless. Their courts are corrupt and they rule by force, counting upon the unthinking and recruiting the naive as allies and collaborators. Unless and until we recognize that appeals to conscience and justice carry no weight with the Global Mafia Cartel, we are diminishing our ability to resist. How many times have I heard that the next Tribunal decision will be a ‘watershed’, that the next court case will be a ‘game-changer’, that the next legal appeal will ‘shock the world’, that the next revelation of medical criminality will ‘turn the tables’?  Far too many.
Here in New Zealand doctors who have had the egregious audacity to have attempted to help their patients by prescribing Ivermectin, for example, or who have dared to insist upon informed consent as applied to the covid inoculation, or who have had the temerity to question the government’s apocalyptic covid policies remain under attack, their licenses to practice threatened by the Medical Council of New Zealand, a proxy for the Federation of State Medical Boards, yet another puppet arm of the overarching Cartel.
Recently a colleague and friend was hauled before a Health Professionals Disciplinary Tribunal, during which he proceeded to eviscerate the case against him by providing an exemplary and fact-based retort to their attacks upon him. Generally the Tribunal issues a decision within days; in his case it has been thirteen weeks and counting.  Should we have expected any different, should we expect a just decision from a system that is thoroughly compromised and bent upon an agenda, should we expect good where there has been an agglomeration of evil? Clutching to fragile tendrils of hope within a decaying and rigged framework serves only to hinder our efforts to insist upon real justice, real science and real accountability, and to guard zealously our already limited freedoms.
Although we are admittedly in an irregular war for which no certain rules can be established, the ever-persisting belief in the System’s ability to correct itself, manifested by those who continue against all evidence to date to play their game by keeping mum or clinging to the illusion of a victory in rigged courts, will only prolong our misery.
In 480 B.C. all of Greece was under attack by Xerxes and his massive army of Persians.  The Greek city-states, fractious and competitive as they were, united in an attempt to stop the invasion. They were vastly outnumbered by land and by sea and there was no way out but surrender. Under the leadership of the Athenian general Themistocles they decided to stake everything on a battle in the waters near Athens, at Salamis, in the Saronic Gulf.  
This meant that the great city of Athens itself would be abandoned to Persian forces, who overran and destroyed its temples; it meant that every citizen staked everything on a battle that would decide upon freedom or slavery.
During that fateful September day at Salamis so many centuries ago the Greeks managed to thrash the much larger Persian fleet, to repel Xerxes and to reclaim their territories, marking an epochal event in the history of what we have come to call the West.
The enemy we face today is larger, more encompassing and determined not just to kill bodies but to destroy the very foundations of human identity. They have seemingly limitless power at their command, firm control over communications, and they rely on thoughtless minions to further their ideologically and physically murderous aims.
They will never be defeated by compromise or acquiescence, because this battle is a culminating one.
This battle is one that will require of us, of the stubborn minority, the courage to sacrifice our homes and livelihoods and material possessions. Yes, it’s that big, that overwhelming, that final, even if it may be beyond our comprehensive faculties. It will require that we no longer play ball with the Devil.
This is our Salamis.
It’s time.
Emanuel E. Garcia, M.D. July 2023

ANGER / VIOLENCE

When were people taught that anger and violence were more persuasive than talking sense.

I am getting more and more worried about the violence shown among those who demand others allow them to do what they want.  I see videos of overweight, angry “women” demanding that they have a right to be women even though they are men.  I see their “husbands” (female) almost spitting in their hatred and demanding that their “wives” (male) be respected. https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ogbl#search/info%40rebelnews.com/WhctKKZGZCVtkJmcprTbDZZNMmGHGZdzGfwgPrltLsRpzSwFLCBRnslxGMmmfmfrzSssbgg

I see people beating up on others because they do not immediately kowtow to the nonsense being promoted.  I see teachers acting like zombies instead of being teachers; forgetting about the importance of reading, writing, arithmetic and critical thinking.  Instead pushing genderbending and child pornography upon children who don’t even know what sex is.  At this point I should mention that I believe there are still some excellent teachers out there who do not agree with this current fad.

If a man wants to pretend that he is a woman, or a woman wants to portend she is a man that’s OK with me as it is their choice. I can accept that choice, but what I cannot accept is the concept that their rights supersede mine.

It is also interesting to note that in almost every case it is the “god given right” to express oneself in this manner, yet which “god” actually encourages violence rather than peace and love?

In my world everyone’s rights are equal from Trudeau to the newest baby.  Regretfully my world is old fashioned and even obsolete as no one has the same anti Canadian rights as Trudeau, and the newest babies are almost instantly made sick with a multitude of “mandated” toxic injections. 

The anger remains, but beware:

Our prime purpose in this life is to help others. And if you can’t help them, at least don’t hurt them.     Dalai Lama

I suppose that it is a feature of our world that violence is the only way anyone will pay attention now. Discussion has been relegated to key stokes on a hand-held computer, masquerading as a phone, and can be ended with a click.

In Canada our federal government has shown that what it wants is paramount and if we disagree then we are enemies of the state.  We are not allowed to disagree; we are being told we cannot educate ourselves; we are being stripped of differing opinions and told that what Trudeau (WEF) wants is good for us. We are being told there are a multitude of genders when clearly there are only two. We were told that not to be jabbed with a mRNA gene therapy was dangerous to everyone else and selfish. If we argue(d) then coercion followed by violence is used to force us into line as was the case of the Freedom Convoy.

Violence bought on by anger at peaceful protestors and in that case by fear.

“When government fears the people, there is liberty. When people fear their government, there is tyranny”. – THOMAS JEFFERSON

I suppose that violence has always been with us causing wars about religion, greed or will to subjugate, or even to just steal resources, and since WW2 the threat of violence or the actual use of violence has become the norm.  So it is to be expected that those whose narrow self-serving views that do not have general acceptance should be backed by actual acts of violence. 

‘Government is in reality established by the few, and these few assume the consent of all the rest without any such consent being actually given’…Lysander Spooner.

I also suppose the bottom line is why should I continue to respect the angry demands of those who will not even listen to me?

Jeremy

Truth and Logic, Fact or Fiction

Sometimes in the early hours of the morning I wake and lie in bed letting my mind wander as it will and it takes me to places I wish I could recall more precisely.

For example:

We are told that in the very ancient times humans thought the earth was flat. How this was determined I don’t know but I wondered about those early folk, and their views of what was truth.  Waking up in the morning, hunting for food, surviving, breeding and sleeping; a simple life so why not a flat earth if they ever thought about it.  Did they think?  Who knows – maybe instinct was the controlling factor in life back then, and maybe that instinct is all we have left of them.

I imagined some intrepid souls wandering towards the edge of their flat earth and being alarmed as mountains seemed to rise from the edge and block their way, and even more alarming getting to water that came at them from the edge! How terrifying to see water coming up seemingly from nowhere over the edge and rushing towards them in waves.  Not only that, but it didn’t taste right.

At some point it was realized that the earth was not flat and that the sun dd not travel around the earth, but until then the earth was flat and that was a fact!

Of course, today we know better than they did but our truths/facts are still just as invalid as theirs were back then.

Over the years humans developed the concept of logic which may have come from serious thought – or frivolous for the matter too – and that logic led to questioning the facts offered by the powers that were and still are.  This has manifested itself over the centuries by violent suppression in the form of religious wars which still go on today, by the desire to have what others have, by the need for power and control and by simple greed. That instinct that we inherited from the ancients let us know when something isn’t right but we tend to just shrug it off and ignore it.  Those of us who do pay attention are outcasts.

I suspect that in ancient times we would have been considered wizards or witches and the stake was all we deserved. Today the stake isn’t popular but vilification and deprivation of livelihood is.

Today truth, fact and fiction are so muddled up that logic and instinct are all we have left, and that leads to trouble.

We are fed nonsense by corporate media, and any contrary narrative is “fake” or conspiracy when in “fact” (oops) the opposite may well be – and often is – the “truth”.

Take science for example.  Science is ideas developed by clever people and accepted until disproved. There is never an end to questioning science as new discoveries are constantly being made.  Science is no more a “fact” than the moon is made out of cheese, and being made to pay attention to something on the basis that it is science is absurd because tomorrow it will likely be proven wrong.

We spend millions educating people and then when they use that education to question supposed “facts” we class them as conspiracy nuts.  I say we because we are responsible for allowing our governments to do this.

On that subject there is a mythology out there that democracy is alive and well in the “west”.  Where exactly actually escapes me, but it appears that there is a new idea of democracy coming into being in the form of a multi polar world where all countries will have a say in how they survive and treat each other. No top dog making up the rules and causing wars wherever and whenever it wants but just countries getting along and helping each other out when that help is needed.

 Is that a truth, fact, fiction or wish?

Logically it would be a huge improvement and my instinct tells me that it should happen sooner than later.

Jeremy