The myth that the Government of Canada is a new one

Anyone listening to the histrionics emanating from the Canadian House of Ill Repute concerning the current Liberal Government of Canada being new one can easily see that is a lie.

Real questions asked either in what passes for debate or during the “Oral Questions” waste of time, determine that no answers are given to questions and in some cases front benchers such as Mackinnon or Champagne will not only avoid the question but heap contempt and ridicule upon the questioner.  I have watched two weeks of Oral Questions now and am not able to recall one question being actually answered.  Since this has been the pattern since 2015 I can hardly call this a new government. Oh wait a moment I recall one answer of NO, can’t remember who but it was the only real answer I heard.

Yes, I agree that the elementary school drama teacher devotee of Klaus Schwab and his WEF has luckily been replaced but his replacement, the no taxpaying banker from Europe (also a WEF devotee), with a suspected passion for the destruction of Canada and a blind passion for the man-made climate change hoax is hardly what we needed.

There have been in my life a few people who make the short hairs in the back of my head stand up and he is one of them.  I trust neither his word nor his motives.  He has assembled a front bench of the worst of the last cabinet and some new ones who have absolutely no clue about their portfolios.

To cap it all off we have had since the Canadian confederation in 1867 ( since added to by additional provinces and territories) several layers of governments each with its own economical responsibilities, and the 1982 version with the included Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (completely ignored by the Trudeau version of terrorists).

The federal government. the provincial legislatures and the municipal councils.  Each has their own economical responsibilities, based on local taxation, and each one supposedly controlled by its residents, as is suggested by democracy.   Regretfully that democracy has not existed in Canada ever.

But now this converted banker wants to create one economy for Canada!!!    “One instead of thirteen” he boasts, but he is forgetting all the municipal councils and indigenous councils across Canada. What a strange thing to do unless the idea is to make it easier to give Canada to the WEF.   Yet, every liberal in our house of ill repute sems to be championing this absurd idea as if it was possible without a constitutional change. 

It sounds like another Liberal pipe dream with a dry ending.

They are also boasting a tax cut to 22 million Canadians that is half the population (?) which amounts in my case to half my weekly grocery bill.    What makes me laugh is that he wants this to happen by Canada Day 2025 ?????

There is just over three weeks to get it read twice, debated, taken to committee (which hasn’t even been appointed yet) and then read/debated again and sent to the senate, and then after the same process in the senate passed and sent to the GG for approval.  Good luck.

Maybe he will learn that trying to get things done quickly in a dysfunctional parliament is a great deal harder than canceling funds and livelihoods in a bank with a simple stroke of a pen.

I also notice that almost everything he says is an admission that the last decade has been one of abject failure which he now comes in on a long white limo to fix.   I agree with the decade of failure but I do not believe he is not the man to fix it.

Maybe all new Bills should be entitled “The Banker’s Bill to:….”

Jeremy

Rule of Law in Canada?

26th May 2025

Last night somehow, I found myself watching CPAC on which there was a panel of three Supreme Court of Canada judges at UVIC answering questions.

One came from a usual member of the public, who had no idea about the court system, requesting the judges’ reactions to bail hearings setting people free after serious crimes. The supreme court does not offer bail as they are a stage way beyond that, however the chief justice in reply mentioned that in Canada the principal is “innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt” so bail, except in extreme cases, is almost mandatory and immediate.

Instantly the case of Tamara Lich came to my mind, where she was arrested on the charge of “mischief” (such a violent, viscous and hateful crime !) and was kept in jail – not a comfortable prison- but in jail, solitary confinement yet, despite not having been convicted of anything for 2 weeks before a bail hearing was even held. Meanwhile, Canada’s bail laws continue to allow habitually violent offenders loose after just a few days or maybe even hours in custody.

The Canadian Criminal Code states: “Persons who are charged with an offence are constitutionally entitled to be released from custody unless Crown Counsel is able to justify their continued detention … including consideration of the background of the accused and risk to the public.” It’s inconceivable that Lich could be considered a risk to anyone. Times Colonist Gwyn Morgan Mar 21, 2024 2:01 AM

Back to the CPAC program, several times “the rule of law” was mentioned by the trio of judges and it has long been my contention that the rule of law does not actually exist here in Canada, after all, how could there still not be any end to the trial of Barber and Lich after over 3 years. On the other hand, a primary school drama teacher turned politician who used hate speech against that Convoy and all its supporters (and that included me) was not charged with anything under the Criminal Code. Lets not also forget the enactment of the Emergencies Act when a simple conversation could have solved the problem. Rule of Law applied to him? Hell no.

To my mind both the Rule of Law and the Charter of Rights a Freedoms were both abandoned by Trudeau and it remains to be seen if this WEF banker will reinstate them.

Somehow I doubt it.

Is the USA leading us into WW3?

At the end of the WW2 as the camps were revealed the whole world held it’s breath in disgust, anger, and sympathy for those who had died and those who had survived.  The inhumanity against the Jews, handicapped and gay people was undeniably a crime against humanity.  The main instigators were tried at Nuremburg, and the rest were spirited to the USA and Canada where they were welcomed and incorporated in various war machines and corporations.

From that time on any hint that the Jewish people were not wonderful humans who could and would do no wrong was classified as anti-semantic. It became a word that the Jewish monsters (B’nai B’rith,  Heather Reisman or Irwin Cotler eg) have hidden behind since then.   No, I am not referring to the average Jew but those whose contempt and hatred of the world combined with their self-glorification, has led to the present condition in Gaza and the West Bank by the Zionists who are now acting like Nazis .

It is amazing to me that the descendants of those who suffered in Europe are now doing the same thing to those of Palestine, and are angry at those around the whole world who are telling them they are wrong. I say that knowing that the USA and Canada officially back the killers ignoring the fact that the vast majority of their people do not bow low to Zionists and abhor the violent inhumane destruction and killing they are carrying out. 

Most people I talk to had no particular feelings towards either Palestinians or Jews until this whole thing blew up.  Many of them knew about the constant killing and or displacement of Palestinians who had lived in the West Bank for decades, but they did not want to get involved.  The constant removal of Palestinians from their lands by settlers who seemed to think they were above the law based on the infamous USA and western alliance tacit approval was something to wonder at but not do anything about.

Just as in Ukraine, the USA meddling had the desired effect – sales of US armaments to be a benefit to the military industrial complex we were warned about..

Yes Israel has the right to exist but not at the complete destruction of another nation.

Today 8th December I see that the USA is now almost openly claiming that Israel is one of their states in a speech by their ‘delegate’ at the UN as he rejected yet another attempt at a ceasefire in Gaza.

I have to wonder what is the point of the UN now?  It is an expensive entity that is toothless unless the US allows it to chew. I am not in charge of any country but if I was, I would be encouraging every UN country to expel the US ambassadors or whatever from my/their country, withdraw my ambassador from the US and also leave the UN.

It is abundantly clear that the USA still thinks it is in charge of the world, and what they say will stand.

How long will we allow that to continue?

How long will we bow down to unelected entities such as the WEF and the WHO and their ilk?

How long will we allow our elected representative MPs to disregard our needs in favour of their leaders needs which are dictated by non-Canadians anyway?

How long will we allow our Rights and Freedoms and Rule of Law to be controlled by foreign entities?

How long will we be subject to NATO and its US thirst for blood and dominance?

Why are landlocked European countries or those around the North Sea tied to us militarily?

How exactly will the decision of the Donbas to join with Russia cause a danger to Canada?

Questions we need to answer if we really care for what is happening to Canada.

We need new independent MPs from non-controlling parties which do not have any desire to look after Canadians once the polls close.

When will we actually vote for a representative rather than a party and therefore a PM?

Come on Canada we are better than this ! Or we shouyld be.

Jeremy