Tag Archives: Mark Holland

The unelected “WHO” and it’s ridiculous attempt to take over the world.

The Honourable Melanie Joly Minister of Foreign Affairs

The Honourable Arif Virani Attorney General and Justice Minister

The Honourable Anita Anand Treasury Board

The Honourable Mark Holland Minister of Health

The Honourable Pascale St-Orange Minister of Canadian Heritage

5th April 2024

Ladies and gentlemen,

As members of the cabinet of the current Canadian government, you must be aware that the 77th World Health Assembly is set to take place in Geneva, Switzerland, May 27-June 1.

The subject is all about the WHO’s International Health Treaty that is supposed to be binding under international law. Quite apart from the obvious fact that international law is not being abided by at this time by multiple partners (including Canada), to have an unelected privately owned entity try to assume dominion over the world is somewhat ridiculous even by this Canadian Government’s standards.

The basic agreement has some logic to it as to possible “recommended” actions promoted by real scientist and doctors, but the amendments or regulations, just as in every piece of Canadian law, are very much against the people of any country foolish enough to sign, since they change the entire concept of the law or in this case treaty, instead setting up mandates..

From :

The Defender  https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/who-power-grab-pandemic-treaty-support-letter/?utm_source=luminate&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=defender-wk&utm_id=20240331

(So much more reliable than the Canadian mainstream propaganda outlets)

“If you don’t pay attention to anything else, you must pay attention to Article 18 of the IHR amendments,” Lindley said.

According to Article 18 of the proposed IHR amendments, “Recommendations issued by WHO to States Parties with respect to persons may include the following advice”:

  • Review proof of medical examination and any laboratory analysis.
  • Require medical examinations.
  • Review proof of vaccination or other prophylaxis.
  • Require vaccination or other prophylaxis.
  • Place suspect persons under public health observation.
  • Implement quarantine or other health measures for suspect persons.
  • Implement isolation and treatment where necessary of affected persons.
  • Implement tracing of contacts of suspect or affected persons.
  • Refuse entry of suspect and affected persons.
  • Refuse entry of unaffected persons to affected areas.
  • Implement exit screening and/or restrictions on persons from affected areas.

“Even more troubling,” Roguski said, are proposed amendments to Annex 6 which “empower the WHO to be the sole authority empowered to determine which ‘vaccines’ or other prophylaxis would be deemed to be acceptable for international travel.”

So where is Canada going to stand on this? 

With the WHO (and WEF) or with the Canadian people whose almost ruined healthcare system will be destroyed by such a “treaty”.

The eagerness, willingness and false earnestness the Prime Minister showed in creating fear – almost panic – among Canadians ever day for months over a fake event but to his eventual financial gain (through his family foundation and Aquitas) should have taught us something, but apparently not.  Fear, hate speech and coercion were the order of the day, and we are being asked to go there again but next time by the WHO.

We will have fewer doctors as many of those who submitted the covid plandemic orders because their provincial professional colleges coerced them to, may well object to another unelected overseas entity telling them what they can and cannot do or say.  Nurses and health practitioners of all stripes may well join in because their oath is also “to do no harm” and then we will truly see people die off here in Canada.  It is to be regretted that Canadian politicians pledge an oath to a foreign king rather than the people of Canada who they are supposed to represent.

What about those Canadian people? Do we fit into this picture in your vision at all?

We do not have Democracy in Canada,

We have no Rule of Law in Canada,

We do not have a Charter of Rights and Freedoms in Canada that is recognized by this government.

Are you willing to give away our sovereignty as well?

Once again, I state that I do not agree with or give my consent to the government of Canada giving these sovereign rights to an unelected, privately sponsored international entity (WHO), and I have no intention of submitting to it’s current or future dictates.

“ I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind ”― John G. Diefenbaker (The 13th prime minister of Canada)

Jeremy

PUBLIC HEALTH AGENCY OF CANADA

The Honourable Mark Holland

Canadian Minister of Health

MP for Ajax, Ontario

I appreciate that you are new in this position and that there are things for you to catch up on, but I must express my concern over this handing over of our medical establishment to the WHO.

From the PHA of Canada website:

1.         Canada.ca

 2.        Public Health Agency of Canada

 3.        Emergency preparedness and response

Canada and the International Health Regulations (IHR):

Overview

The International Health Regulations (IHR) (2005) are binding on the World Health Organization (WHO) and 196 countries (known as States Parties), including Canada. (How are we bound in any way with an unelected body financed by Bill Gates and GAVI?)

The IHR, which came into force in 2007, require countries to work together for global health security. They are focused on addressing serious public health threats that have the potential to spread beyond a country’s borders to other parts of the world. Through the IHR, countries have agreed to build their capacities to detect, assess, report and respond to public health events.

The IHR aim to prevent, protect against, control and respond to the international spread of disease and other public health risks, while avoiding unnecessary interference with international traffic and trade.

(Whatever we do it must not affect the profits of big corporations eh?)  They’re also designed to reduce the risk of diseases spreading at international airports, ports and ground crossings.  (How will this be accomplished without interference?)

Other obligations established by the IHR require countries to, for example:

•           strengthen their national surveillance and response capacities

•           report certain public health events to WHO   (what events would that be?)

The IHR also establish a number of procedures that WHO must follow as the coordinating body. This makes the IHR a necessary public health instrument central to ensuring global health security.    (Why have these people not been elected by all the countries that belong to the WHO and why are they not drawn from those countries?  What is the point of having our own health officials – qualified or not – determine what happens here in Canada if we are going to kowtow to the WHO?)

Implementing the IHR in Canada

In Canada, the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) is the lead organization for implementing the IHR. PHAC is also Canada’s designated National IHR Focal Point (NFP). As the NFP, PHAC coordinates the implementation of the IHR on behalf of the Government of Canada.  (No they don’t, they implement it on behalf of the WHO.)

IHR activities are a shared responsibility. This means that Canada’s Health Portfolio, other federal departments and provincial/territorial governments support IHR implementation.  (In other words, we hand over our medical affairs to an unelected body which has no medical expertise but lots of big pharma connections – great!)

Canada implements the IHR under existing legislation, regulations, policies and agreements in place at both the federal and provincial/territorial levels.

The success of IHR implementation in Canada relies on ongoing collaboration by all partners to carry out surveillance, reporting, notification, verification, response and collaboration activities:

•           across the country and

•           at international points of entry (airports, ports and ground crossings)

Because legislation differs among federal and provincial/territorial governments, Canada has mechanisms, agreements and plans in place that enable national coordination. (What are those plans and when were we told about them?) This is particularly important during public health emergencies that require federal involvement.

It seems that whoever decided this has forgotten that health is a provincial responsibility; and when our politicians get involved, as with the Covid version of the flu, immense damage was done not only to Canada’s sovereignty but also to Canadian small businesses and way too many people who were illegally coerced into taking an unproven, experimental gene therapy injection, wearing useless masks, and the segregation of both family and church – except where big business was concerned, and the closure of schools.

It appears that not only were no lessons learned during that dark period in our recent history but that our leaders are rushing to repeat it.  This time however they are preparing to pass the responsibility over to the WHO.

Is this what Canadians want or is it simply the dictates of those in the control of external forces such as the WEF?

Which ever we have been there and done that and are not willing to do it again.

Jeremy Arney

Leader of the Canadian Action Party

Saanichton BC

Ps

Just to satisfy my curiosity I went to se if there was anything else to see about plans for national coordination and lo and behold I found that there is something called:

Blueprint for a Federated System for Public Health Surveillance in Canada, from the Pan-Canadian Public Health Network

Within that Network of unelected so-called medical experts there is the Council of Chief Medical Officers of Health, and the current chair is Bonnie Henry.  That tells me all I need to know about the PCPHN.

However, I did look at the “Blueprint” and was amazed at the depth that it has been analyzed and developed imagining that most of it came from the WHO which of course is the main benefactor.  There are soo many suppositions and contradictions within this blueprint I copied some of them and then decided that maybe if you really want to see them, look for yourself and don’t be biased by my thinking.

One thing that struck me is that there is nowhere in this blueprint for “opposing” thought. As was clearly shown in the covid flu panic anything that was not according to Justin, in our case, was vigorously opposed and dissenting voices were silenced as doctor after doctor and nurse after nurse either quit or were delicensed out of the profession.

Yes, the “blueprint” is mostly about surveillance (which in itself is an ethical problem when it comes to releasing information on medical matters) but surveillance should include all matters not just what big pharma want to have presented to increase their profits.

There is also the problem that way too many Canadians do not have a family doctor and only go to the hospital when something gets serious, so gathering information (surveillance) will essentially be a problem. 

The other aspect of this Blueprint is that all Provinces and Territories will have to sign on, and as Ontario is going to the private health care option (while still taking federal money) and Quebec is naturally against anything that they do no choose for themselves there will be a big problem here.

I wonder how much money was spent on developing this Blueprint and who paid for it?  I doubt that we got reimbursed by the WHO or the WEF