I have been trying to find anything that either Trudeau or you said about the Israeli attack on the Iranian embassy in Damascus, and I regret that I could not find even a single word, never mind one of condemnation. Perhaps you both have your heads so buried in the sand that you did not even notice such a deliberate attack against an embassy.
It would be charitable to think so, but I know I am mistaken in that thought.
As a watcher on CPAC I saw you today in your asinine talk to the press gallery about the middle east, really an Iranian rant.
An Israeli attack on an Iranian embassy in Damascus killing 16 people inside it, (and blowing out the windows of our embassy) is not even worth a mention by you or this government even though it is contrary to all international laws. But a display of rockets aimed at military targets and meant to test the defense system of Israel and cost them quite a chunk of change and which killed NOBODY caused you all to lose your twisted minds.
You and Trudeau do not speak for Canadians, you speak on behalf of the Jewish lobby in Canada and the WEF. Thus, we are tarred with a brush of your choosing not ours.
This unwavering support of the most obnoxious people in the world is unworthy of Canada, and I am sure it only happens because of your terror of the Jewish lobby here.
You announced that you are flying to Italy tonight and I hope you make it very clear that you do not represent the people of Canada, but you can speak for the Canadian Jewish Lobby.
The governmental reaction to this mess sickens me and I cannot condone it, agree with it or support it.
Jeremy Arney
“Civil disobedience becomes a sacred duty when the state becomes lawless and corrupt.” Mahatma Ghandi
The Honourable Melanie Joly Minister of Foreign Affairs
The Honourable Arif Virani Attorney General and Justice Minister
The Honourable Anita Anand Treasury Board
The Honourable Mark Holland Minister of Health
The Honourable Pascale St-Orange Minister of Canadian Heritage
5th April 2024
Ladies and gentlemen,
As members of the cabinet of the current Canadian government, you must be aware that the 77th World Health Assembly is set to take place in Geneva, Switzerland, May 27-June 1.
The subject is all about the WHO’s International Health Treaty that is supposed to be binding under international law. Quite apart from the obvious fact that international law is not being abided by at this time by multiple partners (including Canada), to have an unelected privately owned entity try to assume dominion over the world is somewhat ridiculous even by this Canadian Government’s standards.
The basic agreement has some logic to it as to possible “recommended” actions promoted by real scientist and doctors, but the amendments or regulations, just as in every piece of Canadian law, are very much against the people of any country foolish enough to sign, since they change the entire concept of the law or in this case treaty, instead setting up mandates..
(So much more reliable than the Canadian mainstream propaganda outlets)
“If you don’t pay attention to anything else, you must pay attention to Article 18 of the IHR amendments,” Lindley said.
According to Article 18 of the proposed IHR amendments, “Recommendations issued by WHO to States Parties with respect to persons may include the following advice”:
Review proof of medical examination and any laboratory analysis.
Require medical examinations.
Review proof of vaccination or other prophylaxis.
Require vaccination or other prophylaxis.
Place suspect persons under public health observation.
Implement quarantine or other health measures for suspect persons.
Implement isolation and treatment where necessary of affected persons.
Implement tracing of contacts of suspect or affected persons.
Refuse entry of suspect and affected persons.
Refuse entry of unaffected persons to affected areas.
Implement exit screening and/or restrictions on persons from affected areas.
“Even more troubling,” Roguski said, are proposed amendments to Annex 6 which “empower the WHO to be the sole authority empowered to determine which ‘vaccines’ or other prophylaxis would be deemed to be acceptable for international travel.”
So where is Canada going to stand on this?
With the WHO (and WEF) or with the Canadian people whose almost ruined healthcare system will be destroyed by such a “treaty”.
The eagerness, willingness and false earnestness the Prime Minister showed in creating fear – almost panic – among Canadians ever day for months over a fake event but to his eventual financial gain (through his family foundation and Aquitas) should have taught us something, but apparently not. Fear, hate speech and coercion were the order of the day, and we are being asked to go there again but next time by the WHO.
We will have fewer doctors as many of those who submitted the covid plandemic orders because their provincial professional colleges coerced them to, may well object to another unelected overseas entity telling them what they can and cannot do or say. Nurses and health practitioners of all stripes may well join in because their oath is also “to do no harm” and then we will truly see people die off here in Canada. It is to be regretted that Canadian politicians pledge an oath to a foreign king rather than the people of Canada who they are supposed to represent.
What about those Canadian people? Do we fit into this picture in your vision at all?
We do not have Democracy in Canada,
We have no Rule of Law in Canada,
We do not have a Charter of Rights and Freedoms in Canada that is recognized by this government.
Are you willing to give away our sovereignty as well?
Once again, I state that I do not agree with or give my consent to the government of Canada giving these sovereign rights to an unelected, privately sponsored international entity (WHO), and I have no intention of submitting to it’s current or future dictates.
Canadian Minister of Justice, Attorney General for Canada, MP for Parkdale-Hyde Park
Sent by email 12 October 2023 to all Canadian MPs,
We have a Prime Minister who claims all around the world, much to the amusement of those to whom he is speaking, that Canada believes in “the rule of law“. There is hardly a Canadian left who believes him, and I think it might be your job to change that and re-establish that “rule of law” not only in our political system but more importantly in our judicial system. Your predecessor had no interest in doing any of that as he simply stood by while the Emergencies Act was invoked without the necessity for such an action being present. Did anyone expect the commission to come up with any other decision than the one it arrived at? It was so predictable.
Our courts are supposed to uphold the laws that our elected representatives have passed, often without the consent of the people of Canada, and not to put their own political interpretation on those laws, thus changing the way they are implemented.
As Attorney General it is your job to oversee the courts rather than bow to the demands of the PMO. It will probably get you fired as it did Jody Wilson-Raybold, but it will make history of the right kind, and most likely will get you re-elected.
When Chief Justice Wagner of our Supreme Court decries what is known around the world as a peaceful protest this way:
In his interview with Le Devoir, Wagner characterized the protest on Wellington Street, where Parliament and the Supreme Court are located, as “the beginning of anarchy where some people have decided to take other citizens hostage.” The article reports Wagner as having declared that “forced blows against the state, justice and democratic institutions like the one delivered by protesters … should be denounced with force by all figures of power in the country.”
He is making the case for peaceful protestors to be dealt with by violence instead of discussion. Of course, that violence for which he advocated is exactly what happened and the world watched and realized that Canada was now simply a vassal state of the WEF or simply a wet blanket with no sovereignty.
We, as Canadians, have a supreme court that is no longer separate from the PMO or indeed even capable of judging the law as they are now a “semi-legal” arm of that PMO. They refuse to hear cases on constitutional matters because it would appear they might have to rule against the PMO and so by refusing to hear such cases they avoid that situation.
This is your responsibility as AG. To ensure that the Laws of Canada are followed by ALL – NO EXCEPTIONS. If our constitution actually means anything under the law then it should be upheld. If it does not apply any more than it should be repealed.
Are you willing to take that step, or will you insist that our law be followed by everyone – political, legal or citizen?
If you cannot then resign and let someone who will take it on take it on.
The Canadian people elected representatives to take actions on their behalf, not on behalf of the PMO and the WEF, and it is time you stepped up to the plate along with all your fellow MPs and allowed us to live in peace and maybe even a little love, instead of being trampled with fake nonsense, division and hate.
Jeremy Arney
cc: Hardcopies by Canada Post to all members of the Supreme Court of Canada.
Jeremy Arney's Blog 