Author Archives: iamjema

Sovereingty and Democracy falacy

The Right Honourable Melanie Joly

Canadian Minister of Foreign Affairs

Member of the WEWF

MP for Ahuntsic-Cartierville

RE Speech to Economic Club 30th October 2023.

I watched your speech and felt great despair.

I heard you talk about many things that Canada should not be involved in and then you talked at great length about two subjects:

Sovereignty:

How on earth can you say that Canada is a sovereign country? We are controlled by the unelected WEF (plus we will soon be giving our national health system to the unelected WHO) the IMF, World Bank, BIS,  CIA, Nazi government of Ukraine, NATO, Zionist State of Israel, and of course the USA.

This shows sovereignty?

Sovereignty would include rule by the people of Canada and yet we do not count.

Democracy:

I have been a Canadian since 1965 and have voted in every federal election since then. I have never been asked for my opinion on any piece of legislation that has come before the Canadian House of Ill Repute by any of the many MPs who are supposed to have represented me or those not doing so now. Democracy in Canada lasts for less than a day and as soon as the polls close on election day it is dormant for another few years, as you all return to the wishes of your party whips and partisan party caucuses while giving only lip service to the people of Canada.

Canada is a parliamentary democracy which is an oxymoron in itself and is not and never will be a democracy, yet all 338 MPs declare with great feeling and pride about our “democracy” showing that you are all hypocrites or ignorant.

“The question arises: who has the right to supervise society, and to point out deviations that may occur from the laws of society? Democratically, no one group can claim this right on behalf of society. Therefore, society alone supervises itself. It is dictatorial for any individual or group to claim the right of the supervision of the laws of the society, which is, democratically, the responsibility of the society as a whole.”        The Green Book

From your speech:

“…first defending our sovereignty and second using pragmatic diplomacy to engage countries of different perspectives”

“Canada’s sovereignty must be resilient to threats of every nature regardless of where they originate”

“Now let’s talk about Democratic sovereignty because Canada is a proud democracy, we have a long democratic tradition 

….this is why it’s even more important to protect our democracy here at home because we can never take it for granted we need to nurture it because nurturing it is a choice, one that we must make every day

We must now chart a path towards building a steady footing for our children, reinforce the International System that has brought about global stability and reshape it to become more inclusive. Canadians can be assured that our eyes are wide open to this challenge and we are dedicated to ensuring that Canada and our diplomats around the world are equipped to tackle these “

That international system to which you refer has led directly to the mess the world is in today, which by any standards is not one of stability (currently three USA inspired wars!) so it is time to change it for something that works for all people of all countries equally, rather than just a few self-centered and greedy ones.

I fear that this government especially, and you, will not lead us to either sovereignty or the possibility of democracy as we are now constituted. I can only hope that you both do the minimum of any more damage to Canada.

Jeremy

The Rule of Law in Canada.

The Honourable Arif Virani

Canadian Minister of Justice, Attorney General for Canada, MP for Parkdale-Hyde Park

Sent by email 12 October 2023 to all Canadian MPs,

We have a Prime Minister who claims all around the world, much to the amusement of those to whom he is speaking, that Canada believes in “the rule of law“.  There is hardly a Canadian left who believes him, and I think it might be your job to change that and re-establish that “rule of law” not only in our political system but more importantly in our judicial system. Your predecessor had no interest in doing any of that as he simply stood by while the Emergencies Act was invoked without the necessity for such an action being present. Did anyone expect the commission to come up with any other decision than the one it arrived at?   It was so predictable.

Our courts are supposed to uphold the laws that our elected representatives have passed, often without the consent of the people of Canada, and not to put their own political interpretation on those laws, thus changing the way they are implemented.

As Attorney General it is your job to oversee the courts rather than bow to the demands of the PMO. It will probably get you fired as it did Jody Wilson-Raybold, but it will make history of the right kind, and most likely will get you re-elected. 

When Chief Justice Wagner of our Supreme Court decries what is known around the world as a peaceful protest this way:

In his interview with Le Devoir, Wagner characterized the protest on Wellington Street, where Parliament and the Supreme Court are located, as “the beginning of anarchy where some people have decided to take other citizens hostage.” The article reports Wagner as having declared that “forced blows against the state, justice and democratic institutions like the one delivered by protesters … should be denounced with force by all figures of power in the country.”

He is making the case for peaceful protestors to be dealt with by violence instead of discussion.  Of course, that violence for which he advocated is exactly what happened and the world watched and realized that Canada was now simply a  vassal state of the WEF or simply a wet blanket with no sovereignty.

We, as Canadians, have a supreme court that is no longer separate from the PMO or indeed even capable of judging the law as they are now a “semi-legal” arm of that PMO.  They refuse to hear cases on constitutional matters because it would appear they might have to rule against the PMO and so by refusing to hear such cases they avoid that situation.

This is your responsibility as AG. To ensure that the Laws of Canada are followed by ALL –   NO EXCEPTIONS.  If our constitution actually means anything under the law then it should be upheld. If it does not apply any more than it should be repealed. 

Are you willing to take that step, or will you insist that our law be followed by everyone – political, legal or citizen?

If you cannot then resign and let someone who will take it on take it on.

The Canadian people elected representatives to take actions on their behalf, not on behalf of the PMO and the WEF, and it is time you stepped up to the plate along with all your fellow MPs and allowed us to live in peace and maybe even a little love, instead of being trampled with fake nonsense, division and hate.

Jeremy Arney

​  cc: Hardcopies by Canada Post to all members of the Supreme Court of Canada.

An uneccesary flood?

Once upon a time not so long ago there was a country in North Africa with a really quirky leader.  He had this idea that excellent health care for all, education (real education not gender identification and confusion) including local and international universities paid for by government, homes for everyone who wanted one (not the Bedouin wanderers who didn’t want one anyway – nor his mother till everyone else was settled), cheap loans to start businesses, agriculture in the desert and fresh water for all.   He also had this idea that it would be good if there was an African Central Bank based in Nigeria that would serve all African States and he wanted to finance it and set it up.

This of course was beyond quirky for the World Bank, IMF, BIS, USA and its subservient NATO so the order went out from Washington that NATO, under Canadian command (to Harper and Baird’s delight) should take both his country and he out and install the non-democratic democracy that the US (and Canada) practice so well.  The country was turned back into rubble similar to the stone ages, the quirky leader was murdered and rival factions are still fighting to see who runs the once great ”people first” country.  Some democracy, eh?

What is the significance of this today?

Simple really, the powers that are still fighting among themselves were warned that a dam was cracking, but they ignored the warning and a storm arrived causing that dam and another to break.

Even more deaths and further back into the stone ages. Isn’t there enough natural destruction in the world already without indifference causing more death and sorrow?

Caada, so responsible for the destruction of that country back in 2011 doesn’t have anyone or thing to send to help, partly because we are fighting man-made fires (blaming climate change and fossil fuels instead of cigarettes and matches and a few lightning strikes which are hardfly climate change are they?) and giving all our taxpayers’ money to Nazi Ukraine to be used for fancy cars and mansions in Egypt.

Wow, way to go Canada, eh?  WE are still arguing about building homes for those living in tents under road and rail overpasses with absolutely no idea or plan on how to do it.

Jeremy

Women’s Football World Cup

I was cleaning some of my emails when I came upon this and realised I had not put it here, wher it should actuiall have belonged.

The Honourable Carla Qualtrough Minister of Sport and Physical Activity

The Honourable Marci Ien Minister for Women and gender equality and youth

The Honourable Jenna Sudds Minister of Families, Children and Social Development

I appreciate that here in Canada the interest in sports is basically Ice Hockey, Baseball, Basketball and Canadian Football (such a ridiculous name) performed by men and has been for way too long. In spite of this the women’s Ice Hockey Team has been very successful and one would have thought that with such a feminist government (or one that claims to be) more attention would be paid to women in sport generally.

As an avid supporter (and fairly good amateur player some years ago now) of the beautiful game I have been watching the Women’s Football World Cup from down under.  I have been impressed by the skill and enthusiasm shown by previously unknown countries in this tournament and the general skill on show. The fact that major countries have been defeated by lesser-known teams is exciting and bodes well for the future for this sport.

Regretfully our national team, which won Gold in the last Olympics, was woefully unsupported.  Not only were they match starved but did not even know how or if they would be paid.  It was not surprising to me that they lost in the first round in spite of their best efforts. It was clear to me that they were very short of practice of playing with each other and that is essential in any sport, especially when so much depends on understanding the other players on the team.  In any sport practice alone is not enough, real game experience is needed.

It is unfortunate that money which could have been spent to better prepare our National team for this major tournament was spent instead to support the Nazi efforts to kill and generally maim the people and destroy the infrastructure of the Donbas region of previously declared independent states now part of Russia by their choice.

It is a great puzzle to me why our government supports a toxic proxy war rather than the needs of the Canadian people, but I guess that is what Klaus Schwab asks for.

Do we want to be able to defend our Olympic title?  It appears not.   As minor ministers vaguely responsible for things other than the proxy war or problematic “Climate Change” taxation, perhaps you can prise some money from the clutches of your fellow women (Freeland and Anand) and rescue the Canadian Women’s Football team in time for them to actually make a defense of their title.

If you cannot do that then save the money and don’t send them to be humiliated in France next year.

They deserve more than that as women and athletes.

Jeremy

Canadian Justice gone mad again

September 5th 2023 is the date that two Canadians go on trial for making a fool of Justin Trudeau and his government yet again.

Of all the things that are wrong with Canada the removal of the right to protest the loss of freedoms has led to jail time.   One of the accused has already spent over a month in jail, not prison with all the amenities there, but jail on the charge of “mischief”.  Only in Canada can this miscarriage of justice happen.

Canada once upon a time had a constitution with a built in Canadian Bill of Rights and Freedoms, but they have been caste into the Prime Minister’s file 13 (trash can for those who haven’t worked in a physical office), maybe to be reintroduced by a future government because it was never repealed, simply ignored as an unnecessary inconvenience.

There was a spontaneous protest by Canadian truckers against the illegal, coercive mandates issued by the then Transport Minister – obviously instructed to do so by a prime minister whose family trust owned a percentage of the mRNA jabs system he was pushing so hard. The transport minister obeyed with an eagerness and vindictiveness that was plain for all to see on the CBC broadcasts.

However, this protest struck an international chord and soon other truckers in other countries followed the Canadian lead. Instead of talking or even better, as democracy would suggest, listening to the problems he had caused, police from all over were called in through an invocation of the Emergency Act to put a violent end to the event.  This was rather like taking a sledge hammer to crush an ant.  What had started out and continued as a peaceful protest ended in outright violence from one side only and the gleeful freezing of bank accounts. Second time around for violent Bill Blair (Toronto G20) who now controls the Canadian military instead of the thuggish police so what does that tell you?

Tamara Lich surrendered to police without any hint of resistance and was charged with mischief.  Those who had caused this whole problem and acted with arrogance and distain cheered as she spent over a month in jail, and was only released eventually with restrictions that would have caused any normal person to question just where the rule of law had gone. I could only assume that it joined the Canadian Bill of Rights and Freedoms in Trudeau’s file 13, or simply that the judge was ignorant of the Charter and was having another bad hair day. Certainly, those charged with violent crimes up to and including rape and battery have been and continue to be released the same day on bail, but “mischief” now requires the judicial kitchen sink..

So a woman who coordinated the event is being dragged to court again not so much for what she actually did but more for the fact she showed up the pathetic actions of a government and PM bereft of any real ideas or concept of democracy but which are ruled and directed by the WEF and WHO and of course profit for the family trust.  

I make no apologies for supporting this protest through both the fund raising platforms, and since I did not get my money back from either I assume that it is being held in escrow for one Zexi Li

Oh boy what a windfall for her.  Not my measly contribution but her share in the $14 million or so sitting in that escrow account.  Bet Trudeau wishes he could find a way to get some of that for his reelection campaign, even 1% !!!.

I imagine CBC might report some of it, but I am sure it will be available thtough the real news on line such as Rebel News!.

I will be watching.

Jeremy

PRESIDENTIAL DOUBLE SPEAK

Once upon a time a sitting president of the USA uttered these words as if he not only believed them to be true but also expected the rest of the world to believe them.

Some nations may be able to turn a blind eye to atrocities in other countries. The United States of America is different.   Wherever people long to be free, they will find a friend in the United States…    Obama’

He went on to say:

For generations, the United States of America has played a unique role as an anchor of global security and as an advocate for human freedom. Mindful of the risks and costs of military action, we are naturally reluctant to use force to solve the world’s many challenges. But when our interests and values are at stake, we have a responsibility to act.

“A dead thing can go with the stream, but only a living thing can go against it.”      —G.K. Chesterton

So while this absolute “doublespeak” sinks in let me remind you of what was happening at that time..

The USA was about to use NATO and the World Bank to attack Libya and turn it into a stone age pile of rubble. Apart from the ever-present CIA there were no American troops to spill their blood in that desert turned in to an arable area. But what followed was as savage a beating as any schoolyard bully ever inflicted on a helpless girl.

I am still ashamed that Canada had such a leading role with the avid encouragement from Stephen Harper and John Baird.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/libya-mission-will-include-canada-until-end-pm-vows-1.1018327

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/libya-s-weapons-must-be-safeguarded-baird-says-1.1077850

(from which comes this quote:

“The school year is starting so they’ll have to pay teachers. They’ll have to pay for the electricity, for the water systems, all the other public services that are essential to a stable and free society. So we’re urging them to do it as expeditiously as possible and putting our weight behind others who are making similar calls.”

(Hard to do really as we managed to bomb all the hospitals, schools, water supply and other things except of course the oil refineries. Did we rush to help fix them again? Not a chance. )

From:

https://www.quora.com/Was-Gaddafi-a-good-leader-Why-or-why-not

Kosmas Aitolos

Was Muammar Gaddafia a good leader?

It depends on what is considered good. Jihadists would not call him good as he was against jihadist Islam. A reasonable person would call him good as he gave his people an excellent standard of living , the average Libyan having a better and higher standard of living than the average American.

An intellectual or Progressive Libyan probably thought him bad because of the one party state ,but I bet they now pine for him ,compared to what Nato-America has given them by butchering Gaddafi….

(Based on the UN statistics in 2009 Libya was one of the best countries in human development, education and healthcare.)

After Gaddafi unfortunately most Libyan youths joined militias and many of them were killed in civil wars. Many of the schools which were built in Gaddafi ‘s time became prisons to Libyans. The human rights had the worst records ever. The girls can’t feel safe to go to universities and their families can’t leave them to pursue their studies out of their cities. According to the UN statistics in 2019 Libya scored 115 in education, healthcare and human development compared to 55 in 2009.

All these can show what Gaddafi is in terms of leadership in the national level. All in all the man changed his country from a state needing help to a country who helps and influences other nations such as Africa. When he died Gaddafi was the leader of African union and he was planning to united its currency, army, and economy.

However this was not allowed as appeared in Clinton’s emails recently. The problem with Gaddafi, he was trying to wake up the African sleeping giant which will be very dangerous for America and NATO. They are pretty sure that if Africa stands it will wipe the face of the earth as it has all the resources. Therefore, all the powerful nations want to control it as main resources and market.

This is the main reason behind assassination of Gaddafi and that why he was bad leader.

(or promoted as such).

(He also warned that the African migrants would be a problem if he was taken out and he was right)

So what was Obama actually saying? 

“We have and always will interfere with the workings of any nation that asks for help, and if they do not ask we will give them that help anyway as long as they have something worth taking that we want.”

This of course is my interpretation and judging by what the USA (and NATO allies such as Canada) have done since WW2 I would claim that is pretty accurate.  In order to be the bully you must first bully the defenseless to gain a reputation.

Since the US economy was tottering another war was needed and so a phony proxy NATO war was launched in 2022 as a growth of the civil one started by the USA in 2014 in Ukraine.  (Some will say that the Russians illegally invaded Ukraine, and if that was the case why have they stopped at the edge of the Donbas?) The idea was of course to give masses of out-of-date armaments to the Nazi government there and allow the US industrial military complex to get into high gear to make new weapons.   How is that working out?   Really well as Ukraine is now attacking Russia almost daily and how long will the Russian patience last, I wonder.  That is another thing NATO wants – loss of patience.  And was a promise not made that US weapons would not be used against Russia?  Of course, but any agreement NATO make with Russia is as invalid as the fake concept of  western democracy.

Now of course we have a situation arising in Africa, which almost certainly would not have happened if Gaddafi was still alive, and as usual the US (and Canada) are trying to dictate to these smaller African countries with essential resources what they should do and will be using their favourite first weapon – sanctions anyone? 

Meanwhile the countries of the world which are tired of being bullied are gathering to create their own trading and monetary systems.  What do we hear about that in Canada?  Nothing as the CBC is, it appears, unaware that BRICS even exists.

Gonna be an interesting last half of 2023 me thinks!

Jeremy

“The truth is like a Lion. You don’t have to defend it. Let it loose. It will defend itself.”    St. Augustine

How out of touch can you get?

I received this piece of propaganda and when I had stopped fuming, I found I had to respond.

(from) MélanieJoly <reply@action.liberal.ca> 

We’re able to grow our movement because of supporters like you, Jeremy. (I have not contributed one dime to them yet.)

Grassroots supporters are at the heart of all the work we’re able to achieve for Canadians. Together, with the help of Canadians like you, we’re building a Canada where future generations can thrive.

But when we’re building a better future, the work we do today matters.

Justin Trudeau and our Liberal team are staying focused on making life more affordable (1), accelerating the fight against climate change (2), strengthening our public health care system (3), building safer communities (4), and growing an economy that works for all Canadians (5).

1

I am quite certain that even the rich are noticing that everything has become more expensive in the last 8 years, and that it is harder to find good help at the slave labour rate called our minimum wage. So the question is : More affordable for whom?

2

Climate change has been going on for millions of years and we are still here. Can anyone tell me how much extra carbon has been released by the burning of all those trees?  Some of them have been sequestering carbon for centuries but no one mentions the release volume.

3

Our public health care system is without enough doctors, nurse practioners, nurses, hospitals and family clinics, and all this government thinks about is throwing money at it and blaming the provinces.  The final straw may prove to have been the covid flu fiasco with all its illegal federal coercions on so many levels driving the above practitioners away from medicine by unelected, unaccountable provincial colleges of medical ptofessionals. These same “colleges” are making it damn near impossible for immigrant medical professions to get work here in Canada.

4

Safer communities means catch and release of dangerous criminals but imprisonment of peaceful protestors including faith leaders under the charge of mischief. Meanwhile criminal hate speech is totally ignored and hatred and division has increased under the leadership of this fake feminist along with total support of apartheid systems both here and abroad..

5.

The only person who seems to think the economy works for all Canadians is the finance minister who believes that billions of our tax money are better spent on her Nazi buddies’ bank accounts than on starving, out of work, homeless and sick Canadians.

Other than that, I would say things are just peachy for the out of touch liars called Liberals.

Perhaps Ms. Joly would be better spending less time in Ukraine and more looking at what is happening in the rest of the BRICKS world before it is too late for us to be involved – though I am pretty sure they don’t want us as long as we are slaves to the WEF and USA.

But they are encouraging all countries that believe in a peaceful-get-along-with-each-other-world to join.

Too bad we are not there yet.

 

Jeremy

Sunrise in BC

CMAJ on the recent Plandemic

I am not a medically trained person, have little scientific knowledge but am a pactitioner of logical thinking, so when I was working on my computer with the CBC on as background noise and I heard about this report being published I watched and listened and was so appalled at what I heard I went looking for the report and here is what I think about most of it.

My comments highlighted in bold italics.

Open Access

CMAJ

The evolution of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in Canada: a time-series study, 2020–2023

Interpretation

During the prevaccine and vaccine roll-out intervals, relatively few people in Canada had evidence of humoral immunity to SARS-CoV-2 from an earlier infection.(How can you possibly know this?  Did you test for it and how, or are you guessing? Or are you simply making excuses for not knowing an unknowable, though SRS-Cov has been around for centuries previously known as colds and the flu?) This changed rapidly during the Omicron era; by September 2022, most of the population had detectable antibodies from infection. The rise in infection-induced humoral immunity occurred rapidly across all geographical regions and age groups in Canada. This rapid rise in seropositivity owing to infection occurred despite the roll-out of vaccines in 2021, which led to high rates of vaccine-induced antibodies (how could a gene therapy induce antibodies against a flu virus?) detected across the country,7 protecting most people in Canada from severe illness and death (from what exactly?).7 However, this high vaccine coverage did not prevent the unprecedented transmission and epidemic growth of the Omicron variant in late 2021 and early 2022.8,9 Given the immune evasion and high transmissibility of the Omicron variant,10 most people in Canada now have infection-acquired immunity and vaccine-induced immunity, ushering in an era of hybrid immunity.     It is amazing to me that medical “experts” still believe this unscientific  propaganda nonsense about gene therapy being a vaccination against a virus.  

The rapid rise in infection seen in many countries with high vaccine coverage is explainable, in part, by the limited effectiveness of the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain–based vaccines in preventing infection with the Omicron variant.16 This immune evasion, combined with the high transmissibility of the Omicron variant, allowed the epidemic to spread rapidly.  (Bullshit, it was just a slightly different version of the flu and the mRNA jabs were not ever vaccinations.  How can the CMAJ still expect us to believe that? Plus the damage done by the inducement of spike proteins in the jabbed helped to make them susceptible to this flu variant).

Although the Omicron wave caused similar increases in infection-induced humoral immunity in multiple countries, the implications for population immunity may vary, owing to differences in the sequence and timing of vaccination and infection in each jurisdiction. In Canada, before the Omicron era, most people had been vaccinated, but not infected. During the Omicron wave, most of the population were then infected, likely producing hybrid immunity that potentially could protect against infection for months.17,18 before the Omicron era, most people had been vaccinated, (How could a non vaccination aid with immunity  in any way?  Also strange that after such a high jabbed rate Omicron took off like a normal flu.)

However, antibody levels also differ within Canada across geographical regions and age groups, likely a result of factors that we did not measure (e.g., occupation, booster vaccination status, comorbid conditions). Periodic serosurveillance in the general population in Canada, as well as vulnerable populations, will be important to track waning of serological markers.  (Why did you not measure those things?  Did you not want to know the answer?)

We believe that the lessons learned from our results include a need for Canada to approach pandemic-related problems in a multidisciplinary manner, aligning expertise in public health and pandemic responses with input from the broader scientific community. Although there is a need in a pandemic to rapidly develop vaccines that target a pathogen broadly, control spread and mitigate impacts, it is difficult to fully control pathogens that mutate rapidly through vaccination alone (although vaccination markedly decreased the severity of illness from those infected with SARS-CoV-2)(Prove it). (The concept that gene altering therapy should receive immediate approval from a body (Health Canada) subject to orders from their investors (big pharma) rather than the people of Canada is non only faulty and dangerous but also very unscientific) Measurement and analysis of antibodies to vaccination and infection provide crucial information for clinicians and policy-makers, particularly when rapid emergence of mutations drastically changes interpretation of other sources of surveillance data, such as confirmed infections, hospital admissions and deaths. Although currently challenging to conduct at scale, assays that can give a broader overall picture of immunity, such as measures of cell-mediated immunity and neutralizing antibodies, could further extend our ability to monitor and understand the effects of vaccination and infection.

(I cannot understand why a supposedly august medical body remains fixated on the idea that a gene therapy constitutes a vaccination.  I know you have altered the definition of vaccination to include gene therapy but that is semantics designed to protect yourselves from ridicule. “Multidisciplinary” means more than just the propaganda dogma which we were subjected to during this particular time, and instead of sidelining any scientific proposals or treatments from the “broader scientific community” not conforming to that propaganda they should at least have been taken under advisement.)

Many of the challenges encountered in this study were a result of the lack of coordinated, ongoing serosurveillance capacity in Canada. We were able to bring together many estimates of seroprevalence to describe broad trajectories of population seroprevalence. However, routine serosurveillance — ideally with individual-level linkage to other data, such as testing and vaccination — would allow for a deeper understanding of the causal relationships between the timing and nature of immune system challenges and antibody levels in the population

(Good grief! The annual flus and colds have been around forever and you are still no closer to real-time vaccination than were the ancient Greeks and Romans.  They had a better idea of how to deal with a cold than the modern drug pushers – let it run its course.)

Conclusion

Most people in Canada were infected with SARS-CoV-2 for the first time during the Omicron era, after previously being vaccinated. The highest rates of seropositivity from infection were seen in younger age groups and provinces in Western Canada. As a result, many people in Canada have hybrid immunity against SARS-CoV-2, but variations by age and geography and the potential for waning antibody levels suggest that public health policy and clinical decisions will need to be tailored to local patterns of population immunity.   (An accurate summation of a false hypothesis)

Conclusion

Canada’s record thus far in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic compares favourably to most comparator nations for broad health outcomes, although adverse economic and social impacts are also apparent .(Really? These were all political instigations with absolutely no medical science on view, in fact real medical science was ignored and discarded as unscientific hysterics. Useless and unnecessary shut downs, masking, church and school closures and segregation were in direct contrast to corporate shopping centers and big box stores operations)  As the country continues through subsequent phases of the pandemic, careful collection and analysis of data are necessary, while acknowledging the limits of available indicators and comparisons. Leaders should share new findings with the public transparently and swiftly, and make strategic adjustments to reinforce measures that appear to be successful and to modify others as appropriate. 

As a final insult to our intelligence, you suggest that leaders break eons of practice and share things with us?  All we got from this so called pandemic was lectures and lies from Justin Trudeau, Teresa Tam, and here in BC Bonnie Henry which were totally political and un scientific. You must all live in gilded cages somewhere out in the ether

Who paid for this propaganda, I would really like to know

Jeremy

PUBLIC HEALTH AGENCY OF CANADA

The Honourable Mark Holland

Canadian Minister of Health

MP for Ajax, Ontario

I appreciate that you are new in this position and that there are things for you to catch up on, but I must express my concern over this handing over of our medical establishment to the WHO.

From the PHA of Canada website:

1.         Canada.ca

 2.        Public Health Agency of Canada

 3.        Emergency preparedness and response

Canada and the International Health Regulations (IHR):

Overview

The International Health Regulations (IHR) (2005) are binding on the World Health Organization (WHO) and 196 countries (known as States Parties), including Canada. (How are we bound in any way with an unelected body financed by Bill Gates and GAVI?)

The IHR, which came into force in 2007, require countries to work together for global health security. They are focused on addressing serious public health threats that have the potential to spread beyond a country’s borders to other parts of the world. Through the IHR, countries have agreed to build their capacities to detect, assess, report and respond to public health events.

The IHR aim to prevent, protect against, control and respond to the international spread of disease and other public health risks, while avoiding unnecessary interference with international traffic and trade.

(Whatever we do it must not affect the profits of big corporations eh?)  They’re also designed to reduce the risk of diseases spreading at international airports, ports and ground crossings.  (How will this be accomplished without interference?)

Other obligations established by the IHR require countries to, for example:

•           strengthen their national surveillance and response capacities

•           report certain public health events to WHO   (what events would that be?)

The IHR also establish a number of procedures that WHO must follow as the coordinating body. This makes the IHR a necessary public health instrument central to ensuring global health security.    (Why have these people not been elected by all the countries that belong to the WHO and why are they not drawn from those countries?  What is the point of having our own health officials – qualified or not – determine what happens here in Canada if we are going to kowtow to the WHO?)

Implementing the IHR in Canada

In Canada, the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) is the lead organization for implementing the IHR. PHAC is also Canada’s designated National IHR Focal Point (NFP). As the NFP, PHAC coordinates the implementation of the IHR on behalf of the Government of Canada.  (No they don’t, they implement it on behalf of the WHO.)

IHR activities are a shared responsibility. This means that Canada’s Health Portfolio, other federal departments and provincial/territorial governments support IHR implementation.  (In other words, we hand over our medical affairs to an unelected body which has no medical expertise but lots of big pharma connections – great!)

Canada implements the IHR under existing legislation, regulations, policies and agreements in place at both the federal and provincial/territorial levels.

The success of IHR implementation in Canada relies on ongoing collaboration by all partners to carry out surveillance, reporting, notification, verification, response and collaboration activities:

•           across the country and

•           at international points of entry (airports, ports and ground crossings)

Because legislation differs among federal and provincial/territorial governments, Canada has mechanisms, agreements and plans in place that enable national coordination. (What are those plans and when were we told about them?) This is particularly important during public health emergencies that require federal involvement.

It seems that whoever decided this has forgotten that health is a provincial responsibility; and when our politicians get involved, as with the Covid version of the flu, immense damage was done not only to Canada’s sovereignty but also to Canadian small businesses and way too many people who were illegally coerced into taking an unproven, experimental gene therapy injection, wearing useless masks, and the segregation of both family and church – except where big business was concerned, and the closure of schools.

It appears that not only were no lessons learned during that dark period in our recent history but that our leaders are rushing to repeat it.  This time however they are preparing to pass the responsibility over to the WHO.

Is this what Canadians want or is it simply the dictates of those in the control of external forces such as the WEF?

Which ever we have been there and done that and are not willing to do it again.

Jeremy Arney

Leader of the Canadian Action Party

Saanichton BC

Ps

Just to satisfy my curiosity I went to se if there was anything else to see about plans for national coordination and lo and behold I found that there is something called:

Blueprint for a Federated System for Public Health Surveillance in Canada, from the Pan-Canadian Public Health Network

Within that Network of unelected so-called medical experts there is the Council of Chief Medical Officers of Health, and the current chair is Bonnie Henry.  That tells me all I need to know about the PCPHN.

However, I did look at the “Blueprint” and was amazed at the depth that it has been analyzed and developed imagining that most of it came from the WHO which of course is the main benefactor.  There are soo many suppositions and contradictions within this blueprint I copied some of them and then decided that maybe if you really want to see them, look for yourself and don’t be biased by my thinking.

One thing that struck me is that there is nowhere in this blueprint for “opposing” thought. As was clearly shown in the covid flu panic anything that was not according to Justin, in our case, was vigorously opposed and dissenting voices were silenced as doctor after doctor and nurse after nurse either quit or were delicensed out of the profession.

Yes, the “blueprint” is mostly about surveillance (which in itself is an ethical problem when it comes to releasing information on medical matters) but surveillance should include all matters not just what big pharma want to have presented to increase their profits.

There is also the problem that way too many Canadians do not have a family doctor and only go to the hospital when something gets serious, so gathering information (surveillance) will essentially be a problem. 

The other aspect of this Blueprint is that all Provinces and Territories will have to sign on, and as Ontario is going to the private health care option (while still taking federal money) and Quebec is naturally against anything that they do no choose for themselves there will be a big problem here.

I wonder how much money was spent on developing this Blueprint and who paid for it?  I doubt that we got reimbursed by the WHO or the WEF

Lunatic Fringe or sheer insanity

From the Globe and Mail

Canada to attend conference on Ukraine in Saudi Arabia

STEVEN CHASE  SENIOR PARLIAMENTARY REPORTER

PUBLISHED AUGUST 4, 2023

“Jody Thomas, the national security adviser to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, is leading a Canadian delegation to Saudi Arabia for weekend talks among 40 countries trying to find a peaceful settlement to Russia’s war on Ukraine.

*****

China said on Friday that it would also send a senior official to the talks, but the forum will exclude Russia. (my highlight)

Ukrainian and Western diplomats hope attendees at the meeting in Jeddah will agree on key principles for a future peace settlement.”

“It was not the truth they wanted, but an illusion they could bear to live with”…..Anaïs Nin

It is typical I suppose of Canada that they would waste money sending some delegate or another to one of the most useless conferences yet this year.  Simply put how on earth would you, or even could you, expect anything solid to come from a one-way conference?    I mean really give me a break and allow me to be realistic; if a supposed antagonist is not there how could anything be settled.  It is almost as stupid as giving a gold medal to a man who calls himself Leah in a woman’s’ swimming event; actually, even more stupid and that’s saying something.

It seems that Canada is totally against the events that happened in Donbas in 2022 but not a word about those that happened with our help between 2014 and 2022.   The slaughter, rape, torture and killing of the Russian speaking women, men and children in the Donbas who didn’t want to be part of a Nazi Ukraine is perfectly acceptable to Canada and Canadians as coming to the aid of the downtrodden and terrorized is no longer in the Canadian psyche.  There was also the organ transplant market to be provided with organs of those Russian  “scum” of the Donbas. This Canadian government, which came into power shortly after the CIA inspired Maidan coup, totally supported all this with Canadian forces training of Nazis and no doubt providing weapons and probably doctors as well. I can believe that the Canadian government, which is no longer under Canadian people control, would willingly accept and do such things, but the Canadian people? 

Do they even know the facts? 

Even worse do they even care?

Are they aware of how much our Nazi lovers have donated, and continue to donate, to the Zelensky cause and bank accounts.?   While this government is more than willing to freeze peaceful Canadian protestors’ bank accounts, they are happy to enlarge those of the Ukrainian oligarchs.  Money we could very well spend on health care or housing for the new arrivals to Canada, or the poor and homeless whose number increases by the day, or the damage done by their actions over a strain of flu they called covid..

“Those who tell the stories rule society”…   Plato

Now of course we are going to lose what access we had to such information as only the government propaganda will be available through the CBC, CTV, Global etc., and ignorance will increase exponentially. 

“The truth often evades being recognized due to its utter incredibility”….. Pericles?

But then of course truth is what we are not supposed to hear or know about anymore.   Oher than of course if that truth is governmental truth which in our case means WEF, WHO or Bill Gates truth and has little to do with reality.

What a sad country we have become and the vast majority of Canadians have no idea because their heads are buried in the palms of their hands and the woke idea that somehow male and female humans no longer exist.

Jeremy